2018 Supreme Court of India crisis

The Supreme Court of India was in crisis after an interview given by Supreme Court judges Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan Lokur, and Kurian Joseph, in which they spoke against the Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra[1][2] that he allocates certain politically controversial cases to such benches which gives favourable judgements towards a political party.

The judges mentioned the allocation of the case of investigation of death of Special CBI Judge — BH Loya , who was presiding over Sohrabuddin encounter case, in which the BJP President Amit Shah was the prime accused.

Background

On 12 January 2018, four Supreme Court judges Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan Lokur and Kurian Joseph gave a press meeting in a manner unprecedented. Chelameswar said, “We tried to collectively persuade the chief justice that certain things are not in order and therefore you should take remedial measures....Unfortunately, our efforts failed.” He also said, “that unless this institution is preserved and it maintains its equanimity, democracy will not survive in this country.” The occurred after Misra headed the bench which dismissed the CJAR petition against him, and after the Justice Loya case had attracted scrutiny.[3] The allegations against Misra were related to the allotment of matters to benches and constituting Constitution Benches in a way that arbitrarily ignored Senior Judges of the Court. That important cases were heard by benches headed by Dipak Misra. The judges claimed to have a written a letter to Dipak Misra for which they had not received a reply.[4][5][6][7] After the press conference, Misra created a new judicial roster which excluded those who spoke against him from all constitution benches.[8]

Proposed impeachment of the Chief Justice of India

On 20 April 2018, seven opposition parties submitted a petition seeking impeachment of Dipak Misra to the Vice President Venkaiah Naidu, with signatures from 71 parliamentarians.[9]

gollark: What is this game?!?!?!
gollark: It is annoying and ambiguous because precedence.
gollark: Infix is ambiguous and hard.
gollark: Solution: standardize unambiguous and easy to parse/write notation then make IDEs display parse trees?
gollark: Haskell doesn't cause eyebleeds for me, although it does sometimes cause neurological oddness.

References
  1. "Stunning mutiny in Supreme Court ranks, 4 judges take on Chief Justice of India". The Economic Times. 12 January 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
  2. "Top 4 SC judges revolt against Chief Justice, question 'biased decisions'". Deccan Chronicle. 12 January 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
  3. Dev, Atul. "Dipak Misra's shadow over the Supreme Court". The Caravan. Retrieved 2019-08-16.
  4. "Turmoil in Supreme Court: Top developments". The Times of India. 12 January 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
  5. "India Supreme Court judges: Democracy is in danger". BBC News. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
  6. "Top judges angry about functioning of India's Supreme Court". Fox News. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
  7. Ashok Sharma (12 January 2018). "Judges angry about functioning of India's Supreme Court". The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
  8. Dev, Atul. "Dipak Misra's shadow over the Supreme Court". The Caravan. Retrieved 2019-08-16.
  9. "Chief Justice Dipak Misra Faces Impeachment Motion, 71 Have Signed: 10 Facts". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2018-04-20.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.