2017 Tilia Slovenia Open – Doubles

Sergey Betov and Ilya Ivashka were the defending champions but only Ivashka chose to defend his title, partnering Aldin Šetkić. Ivashka lost in the semifinals to Lukáš Rosol and Franko Škugor.

Doubles
2017 Tilia Slovenia Open
Champions Hans Podlipnik-Castillo
Andrei Vasilevski
Runners-up Lukáš Rosol
Franko Škugor
Final score6–3, 7–6(7–4)
Main article: 2017 Tilia Slovenia Open

Hans Podlipnik-Castillo and Andrei Vasilevski won the title after defeating Rosol and Škugor 6–3, 7–6(7–4) in the final.

Seeds
  1. Hans Podlipnik-Castillo / Andrei Vasilevski (Champions)
  2. Aliaksandr Bury / Dino Marcan (First round)
  3. Johan Brunström / Joe Salisbury (First round)
  4. Albano Olivetti / Igor Zelenay (First round)

Draw

Key
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 H Podlipnik-Castillo
A Vasilevski 		77 6
J Kovalík
S Tsitsipas 		65 2 1 H Podlipnik-Castillo
A Vasilevski 		6 6
WC Jaime Fermosell Delgado
T Kočevar-Dešman 		6 7 WC J Fermosell Delgado
T Kočevar-Dešman 		0 0
T Khabibulin
D Popko 		0 5 1 H Podlipnik-Castillo
A Vasilevski 		6 6
3 J Brunström
J Salisbury 		63 67 M Berrettini
F Cipolla 		3 4
M Berrettini
F Cipolla 		77 79 M Berrettini
F Cipolla 		6 2 [10]
S Clayton
J O'Mara 		6 2 [9] A Menéndez-Maceiras
S Stakhovsky 		3 6 [5]
A Menéndez-Maceiras
S Stakhovsky 		3 6 [11] 1 H Podlipnik-Castillo
A Vasilevski 		6 77
I Bozoljac
F Krajinović 		6 6 L Rosol
F Škugor 		3 64
WC David Lucas Ambrozić
T Žitnik 		2 4 I Bozoljac
F Krajinović 		4 3
I Ivashka
A Šetkić 		6 5 [10] I Ivashka
A Šetkić 		6 6
4 A Olivetti
I Zelenay 		1 7 [8] I Ivashka
A Šetkić 		3 2
WC Grega Boh
Gregor Repina 		0 0 L Rosol
F Škugor 		6 6
P Martínez
R Ortega Olmedo 		6 6 P Martínez
R Ortega Olmedo 		65 0
L Rosol
F Škugor 		6 77 L Rosol
F Škugor 		77 6
2 A Bury
D Marcan 		2 62
gollark: Another issue with voting as a system for dealing with politicians doing stupid things is that it's very slow.
gollark: As a vegetarian, I disagree.
gollark: I'm subscribed to a service which sends me emails about what my local MP (I think the approximate US equivalent is a senator?) does, but it turns out it's actually very boring and I have no idea if they're doing a good job.
gollark: In theory voters should do that, but it's hard to actually *check* if your politician did stupid things, and it is NOT very granular.
gollark: It would probably be good if there was some mechanism for punishing politicians who spend money on things which turned out to be bad/stupid/pointless. Although someone would have to evaluate bad/stupid/pointlessness somehow.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.