2017 Odlum Brown Vancouver Open – Men's Doubles

Men's Doubles
	2017 Odlum Brown Vancouver Open
Champions	James Cerretani; Neal Skupski
Runners-up	Treat Huey; Robert Lindstedt
Final score	7–6(8–6), 6–2

Treat Huey and Frederik Nielsen were the defending champions but chose to defend their title with different partners. Huey partnered Robert Lindstedt but lost in the final to James Cerretani and Neal Skupski. Nielsen partnered Andreas Siljeström but lost in the semifinals to Huey and Lindstedt.

Cerretani and Skupski won the title after defeating Huey and Lindstedt 7–6^(8–6), 6–2 in the final.

Seeds

Treat Huey / Robert Lindstedt (Final)
James Cerretani / Neal Skupski (Champions)
Steven de Waard / Marc Polmans (Quarterfinals, withdrew)
Brydan Klein / Andrew Whittington (First round)

Draw

Key

First Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals				Final

1	T Huey R Lindstedt	6	6
	J De Loore Chad Rhoden	1	1		1	T Huey R Lindstedt	7⁷	4	[11]
	R Bemelmans A Bolt	3	7⁷	[10]		R Bemelmans A Bolt	6³	6	[9]
	B Bonzi Q Halys	6	6⁴	[3]						1	T Huey R Lindstedt	7⁷	7⁹
4	B Klein A Whittington	5	2								F Nielsen A Siljeström	6⁰	6⁷
	F Nielsen A Siljeström	7	6			F Nielsen A Siljeström	6	6
	F Peliwo B Schnur	4	4			L Harris D Sela	2	1
	L Harris D Sela	6	6											1	T Huey R Lindstedt	6⁶	2
	A Krajicek T Sandgren	6	3	[8]										2	J Cerretani N Skupski	7⁸	6
	JC Aragone R Shane	3	6	[10]		JC Aragone R Shane	w/o
WC	Alexander Day T-S Kwiatkowski	3	2		3	S de Waard M Polmans
3	S de Waard M Polmans	6	6								JC Aragone R Shane	4	3
	P Bester M Copil	6	6							2	J Cerretani N Skupski	6	6
WC	George Jecminek Luka Vukovic	4	2			P Bester M Copil	5	6⁵
	L Bambridge D O'Hare	4	4		2	J Cerretani N Skupski	7	7⁷
2	J Cerretani N Skupski	6	6

gollark: <@301092081827577866>Answering questions in the order I read them.

gollark: 8 (personal preference). Ugly syntax

gollark: 7 (mostly due to 1, 2). reliance on code generation as a poor alternative to macros.

gollark: 6 (partly cultural). User/implementer divide. Only the people who write the standard library get to use generics, `recover`, etc. And no.user type can get make, new, channel syntax, generics.

gollark: 1. Lack of generics mean that you can either pick abstraction or type safety. Not a nice choice to have to make.2. The language is horrendously verbose and discourages abstraction.3. Weird special cases - make, new, some stuff having generics, channel syntax4. It's not new. They just basically took C, added a garbage collector and concurrency, and called it amazing.5. Horrible dependency management with GOPATH though they are fixing that.

References

Main Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.