2017 Lima Challenger – Doubles
Sergio Galdós and Leonardo Mayer were the defending champions but only Galdós chose to defend his title, partnering Ariel Behar. Galdós lost in the semifinals to Gonçalo Oliveira and Grzegorz Panfil.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2017 Lima Challenger | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–5, 6–3 |
Miguel Ángel Reyes-Varela and Blaž Rola won the title after defeating Oliveira and Panfil 7–5, 6–3 in the final.
Seeds
Ariel Behar / Sergio Galdós (Semifinals) Máximo González / Fabrício Neis (Semifinals) Romain Arneodo / Marco Cecchinato (First round) Gonçalo Oliveira / Grzegorz Panfil (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 3 | [7] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 77 | [3] | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 63 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [4] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 64 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 77 | [12] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 5 | [11] | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 7 | [9] | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 7 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [8] | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 3 | [8] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [5] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 67 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 79 |
gollark: There's also obviously Bluetooth and all the various other radio communication things.
gollark: 60GHz 802.11ad can probably do *gigabits* a second at shortish distances.
gollark: > We need devices that can emit some ultra speed beeping to encode like a whole sentence of ASCII within a split second to other nearby devicesYou could just... use radio.
gollark: But the MAIN issue is probably just that it's 64kpps Opus, which isn't that great.
gollark: I am not giving you accurate coordinates.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.