2017 Bengaluru Open – Singles

Sumit Nagal won the title after defeating Jay Clarke 6–3, 3–6, 6–2 in the final.

Singles
2017 Bengaluru Open
Champion Sumit Nagal
Runner-up Jay Clarke
Final score6–3, 3–6, 6–2
Main article: 2017 Bengaluru Open

This was the first edition of the tournament.

Seeds
  1. Blaž Kavčič (Quarterfinals)
  2. Adrián Menéndez Maceiras (First round)
  3. Yuki Bhambri (Semifinals)
  4. Elias Ymer (Second round)
  5. Ramkumar Ramanathan (Second round)
  6. Evan King (First round)
  7. Peđa Krstin (First round, retired)
  8. Aleksandr Nedovyesov (Second round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
Sumit Nagal 6 6
3 Yuki Bhambri 4 0
  Sumit Nagal 6 3 6
Jay Clarke 3 6 2
  Jay Clarke 6 6
Yang Tsung-hua 3 4

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 B Kavčič 6 60 78
T Brkić 2 77 66 1 B Kavčič 6 3 6
WC V Vardhan 3 3 M Vilella Martínez 4 6 3
M Vilella Martínez 6 6 1 B Kavčič 3 4
S Nagal 6 6 S Nagal 6 6
Q VS Prashanth 2 0 S Nagal 6 4 7
B Klein 6 1 B Klein 4 6 5
7 P Krstin 4 0r S Nagal 6 6
3 Y Bhambri 6 6 3 Y Bhambri 4 0
S Balaji 3 3 3 Y Bhambri 6 77
LL N Nakagawa 65 3 P Martínez 2 60
Pedro Martínez 77 6 3 Y Bhambri 7 6
G Blancaneaux 62 3 P Gunneswaran 5 2
M Polmans 77 6 M Polmans 2 77 1
P Gunneswaran 6 6 P Gunneswaran 6 61 6
6 E King 4 4

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 R Ramanathan 4 6 6
Hugo Grenier 6 4 3 5 R Ramanathan 77 2 4
J Clarke 6 6 J Clarke 65 6 6
Q Sidharth Rawat 3 3 J Clarke 6 4 77
K Uchida 3 4 A Pavić 2 6 61
A Pavić 6 6 A Pavić 6 62 77
WC Suraj Prabodh 4 62 4 E Ymer 3 77 65
4 E Ymer 6 77 J Clarke 6 6
8 A Nedovyesov 6 6 T-h Yang 3 4
Q M Sabanov 4 1 8 A Nedovyesov 3 6 3
WC Dalwinder Singh 3 4 LL A Escoffier 6 2 6
LL Antoine Escoffier 6 6 LL A Escoffier 4 4
T-h Yang 77 3 T-h Yang 6 6
B Zapata Miralles 61 0r T-h Yang 2 6 6
Q B Gojo 6 1 7 Q B Gojo 6 4 2
2 A Menéndez Maceiras 3 6 5
gollark: I don't think the languages are specified anywhere.
gollark: I mostly want an excuse to do stupid insane things.
gollark: What if CODE GUESSING 17259815?
gollark: What I can easily do is construct a backdoor which nobody else can use, but I don't think that qualifies.
gollark: And practical hidden flaws are more like "if you encrypt 2^16 bytes with the same key it is possible to determine some of the plaintext with slightly higher probability" or known plaintext attacks and such, rather than "hahaha any message whatsoever can be decrypted".

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.