2016 Stockton Challenger – Singles

Singles
	2016 Stockton Challenger
Champion	Alison Van Uytvanck
Runner-up	Anastasia Pivovarova
Final score	6–3, 3–6, 6–2

Nao Hibino was the defending champion, but chose not to participate.

Alison Van Uytvanck won the title, defeating Anastasia Pivovarova in the final, 6–3, 3–6, 6–2.

Seeds

Nicole Gibbs (Second round)
Kristýna Plíšková (First round)
Alison Van Uytvanck (Champion)
Urszula Radwańska (Quarterfinals)
Grace Min (First round)
Taylor Townsend (First round)
Zhu Lin (First round)
Sachia Vickery (Second round)

Main draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals					Final


	Catherine Bellis	2	6	4

3	Alison Van Uytvanck	6	4	6
					3	Alison Van Uytvanck	6	3	6

						Anastasia Pivovarova	3	6	2
	Michelle Larcher de Brito	4	4

	Anastasia Pivovarova	6	6

Top half

First round					Second round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals

1	N Gibbs	5	6	7
PR	A Wozniak	7	4	5	1	N Gibbs	6³	6⁶
	V Kan	4	5			Ar Rodionova	7⁷	7⁸
	Ar Rodionova	6	7								Ar Rodionova	2	3
	Z Yang	2	6⁴								C Bellis	6	6
	C Bellis	6	7⁷			C Bellis	6	6
Q	D Krawczyk	5	3		8	S Vickery	4	0
8	S Vickery	7	6													C Bellis	2	6	4
3	A Van Uytvanck	7	6												3	A Van Uytvanck	6	4	6
	M Oudin	5	2		3	A Van Uytvanck	6	6
	K Ahn	4	6	4		R Sawayanagi	2	0
	R Sawayanagi	6	4	6						3	A Van Uytvanck	6	0	6
Q	J Elie	4	6	6							J Loeb	4	6	3
WC	A Kratzer	6	4	1	Q	J Elie	3	6	2
	J Loeb	6	6			J Loeb	6	4	6
5	G Min	2	1

Bottom half

First round					Second round					Quarterfinals				Semifinals

7	L Zhu	1	1
Q	C Whoriskey	6	6		Q	C Whoriskey	4	3
	M Larcher de Brito	6	4	6		M Larcher de Brito	6	6
	S Sharipova	2	6	0							M Larcher de Brito	6	7
WC	M Gordon	6	2	1						4	U Radwańska	3	5
	S Sanders	3	6	6		S Sanders	3	2
LL	P Hon	6⁴	5		4	U Radwańska	6	6
4	U Radwańska	7⁷	7												M Larcher de Brito	4	4
6	T Townsend	4	4												A Pivovarova	6	6
	M Hibi	6	6			M Hibi	6	4	1
	R Anderson	6	7⁷			R Anderson	3	6	6
WC	S Marand	2	6¹								R Anderson	4	5
	A Muhammad	3	6	2							A Pivovarova	6	7
	A Pivovarova	6	3	6		A Pivovarova	6	6
Q	C Simmonds	7	6		Q	C Simmonds	4	4
2	Kr Plíšková	5	3

gollark: Just say "no unsolicited advertisement". It covers the sensible cases perfectly fine.

gollark: Additionally, please justify your decisions by reference to what actual problems you intend to solve and other things instead of by vaguely implying they're good because other servers do it.

gollark: Oh, you mean "fancy backward regexes"?

gollark: What do you mean a "scripting language"?

gollark: Again, this is bad; rules should be predictable. The consequences of doing a thing should be clear before you do it for them to work. Thusly, minimize deliberate selective enforcement.

References

Main draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.