2016 Sparkassen Open – Singles

Filip Krajinović was the defending champion but chose not to defend his title.

Singles
2016 Sparkassen Open
Champion Thomaz Bellucci
Runner-up Íñigo Cervantes
Final score6–1, 1–6, 6–3
Main article: 2016 Sparkassen Open

Thomaz Bellucci won the title after defeating Íñigo Cervantes 6–1, 1–6, 6–3 in the final.

Seeds
  1. Thomaz Bellucci (Champion)
  2. Íñigo Cervantes (Final)
  3. Florian Mayer (Second round)
  4. Jan-Lennard Struff (Second round)
  5. Leonardo Mayer (First round)
  6. Gastão Elias (First round)
  7. Facundo Bagnis (Second round)
  8. Karen Khachanov (Second round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Thomaz Bellucci 66 6 6
Teymuraz Gabashvili 78 4 4
1 Thomaz Bellucci 6 1 6
2 Íñigo Cervantes 1 6 3
Tobias Kamke 5 3
2 Íñigo Cervantes 7 6

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 T Bellucci 6 6
WC A Beck 3 2 1 T Bellucci 6 6
Q A Pavić 6 77 Q A Pavić 4 3
M Berrer 3 63 1 T Bellucci 6 6
N Basilashvili 1 6 6 N Basilashvili 0 4
I Sijsling 6 2 1 N Basilashvili 6 4 6
Q G Mager 2 77 0 8 K Khachanov 2 6 4
8 K Khachanov 6 65 6 1 T Bellucci 66 6 6
4/WC J-L Struff 6 77 T Gabashvili 78 4 4
Q Juan Ignacio Galarza 3 60 4/WC J-L Struff 3 6 4
J Kovalík 62 6 4 T Daniel 6 1 6
T Daniel 77 0 6 T Daniel 65 1
T Gabashvili 7 4 6 T Gabashvili 77 6
Alt K de Schepper 5 6 1 T Gabashvili 6 77
N Langer 6 6 N Langer 1 65
5 L Mayer 4 4

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 G Elias 3 2
R Albot 6 6 R Albot 6 6
Q C-M Stebe 6 7 Q C-M Stebe 3 4
WC M Bachinger 1 5 R Albot 65 63
T Kamke 6 6 T Kamke 77 77
WC D Masur 4 4 T Kamke 3 6 6
Alt M Michalička 0 7 62 3 F Mayer 6 4 3
3 F Mayer 6 5 77 T Kamke 5 3
7 F Bagnis 6 5 6 2 Í Cervantes 7 6
G Melzer 4 7 2 7 F Bagnis 65 6 4
M Zverev 6 6 M Zverev 77 2 6
D Brands 2 3 M Zverev 4 4
A Michon 6 77 2 Í Cervantes 6 6
Alt Michal Konečný 2 61 A Michon 1 4
LL N Gombos 4 4 2 Í Cervantes 6 6
2 Í Cervantes 6 6
gollark: Interesting.
gollark: Would any of the AI art things actually make it that clean and symmetrical?
gollark: > We are so still at number 1. Is humanity worthy of unlimited power? I’ve heard Larry Page believes the AIs are our children and know more about righteousness than we do. But even early Yudkowsky writings understood this makes no sense, and that superintelligence doesn’t imply supermorality.
gollark: It just says stupid things too.
gollark: That blog post explicitly mentions the orthogonality thing.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.