2016 San Luis Open Challenger Tour – Singles

Guido Pella was the defending champion, but chose not to defend his title.

Singles
2016 San Luis Open Challenger Tour
Champions Peđa Krstin
Runners-up Marcelo Arévalo
Final score6–4, 6–2

Peđa Krstin won the title, defeating Marcelo Arévalo 6–4, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds

  1. Michael Berrer (First round)
  2. Albert Montañés (Semifinals)
  3. André Ghem (Quarterfinals)
  4. Adrián Menéndez-Maceiras (First round)
  5. Matteo Donati (Second round)
  6. Mathias Bourgue (Second round)
  7. Hans Podlipnik (Quarterfinals)
  8. James McGee (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
Federico Gaio 1 4
Q Marcelo Arévalo 6 6
Q Marcelo Arévalo 4 2
Peđa Krstin 6 6
Peđa Krstin 6 6
2 Albert Montañés 2 4

Top half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 M Berrer 3 77 5
F Gaio 6 65 7 F Gaio 6 6
N Milojević 6 6 N Milojević 3 1
O Roca Batalla 4 3 F Gaio 6 6
WC M Sánchez 3 2 7 H Podlipnik 4 1
J Samper-Montaña 6 6 J Samper-Montaña 3 4
J Jung 4 0 7 H Podlipnik 6 6
7 H Podlipnik 6 6 F Gaio 1 4
3 A Ghem 7 77 Q M Arévalo 6 6
D Novak 5 62 3 A Ghem 6 6
WC L Gómez 6 6 WC L Gómez 3 2
D Popko 2 0 3 A Ghem 3 65
Q M Arévalo 6 6 Q M Arévalo 6 77
WC Mauricio Astorga 2 3 Q M Arévalo 61 6 6
D Nguyen 4 4 5 M Donati 77 4 3
5 M Donati 6 6

Bottom half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 M Bourgue 5 6 6
Alt N Barrientos 7 2 0 6 M Bourgue 3 4
P Krstin 6 6 P Krstin 6 6
WC T Hank 3 4 P Krstin 77 6
Q Robin Staněk 6 6 Q C Zampieri 64 3
R Ramírez Hidalgo 3 4 Q R Staněk 3 1
Q C Zampieri 6 1 7 Q C Zampieri 6 6
4 A Menéndez-Maceiras 1 6 5 P Krstin 6 6
8 J McGee 4 2 2 A Montañés 2 4
M Safwat 6 6 M Safwat 79 6
G Lapentti 4 3 L Giustino 67 4
L Giustino 6 6 M Safwat 6 2 65
Q A Velotti 5 6 0 2 A Montañés 4 6 77
L Djere 7 3 6 L Djere 5 65
P Cachín 7 3 65 2 A Montañés 7 77
2 A Montañés 5 6 77
gollark: There are those who'd say it should be to punish criminals, or who say it's just the state enforcing its power.
gollark: Also, I don't think people agree on that being the point.
gollark: It can't be effective at that if people can just work around *it* when they want to.
gollark: Perfect robustness is probably not practical in human social infrastructure but it can at least be better.
gollark: You have to have ones which are better at producing good outcomes even if there is abuse.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.