2016 Lorraine Open 88 – Doubles
Oksana Kalashnikova and Danka Kovinić were the defending champions, but both players chose not to participate.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 Lorraine Open 88 | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–1, 6–3 |
Cindy Burger and Laura Pous Tió won the title, defeating Nicole Melichar and Renata Voráčová in the final, 6–1, 6–3.
Seeds
Nicole Melichar / Renata Voráčová (Final) Cindy Burger / Laura Pous Tió (Champions) Laura Pigossi / Sílvia Soler Espinosa (First round) Misa Eguchi / Evgeniya Rodina (Semifinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 77 | [4] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 64 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 65 | [6] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 0 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 77 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 1 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 0 | 2 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 1 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: Not particularly!
gollark: Yes, praise the supreme sinthoverlord?
gollark: The concept of god does not have significant predictive power because it's uselessly vague.
gollark: You can use maths to make useful predictions, in combination with physics (based on maths).
gollark: Mathematics provides better models of reality than god.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.