2016 Launceston Tennis International – Women's Doubles

Han Xinyun and Junri Namigata were the defending champions, but Namigata chose not to participate . Han partnered Katarzyna Piter , but lost in the quarterfinals to Tammi Patterson and Olivia Rogowska .

Women's Doubles
2016 Launceston Tennis International
Champions You Xiaodi
Zhu Lin
Runners-up Nadiia Kichenok
Mandy Minella
Final score2–6 , 7–5 , [10–7]
Main article: 2016 Launceston Tennis International

You Xiaodi and Zhu Lin won the title, defeating top seeds Nadiia Kichenok and Mandy Minella in the final 2–6, 7–5, [10–7] .

Seeds
  1. Nadiia Kichenok / Mandy Minella (Final)
  2. Han Xinyun / Katarzyna Piter (Quarterfinals)
  3. Varatchaya Wongteanchai / Yang Zhaoxuan (Semifinals)
  4. Hsu Chieh-yu / Hiroko Kuwata (Quarterfinals)

Draw

Key
First round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 N Kichenok
M Minella 		77 4 [12]
Q A Gabueva
A Pivovarova 		65 6 [10] 1 N Kichenok
M Minella 		6 6
WC J Moore
D Yastremska 		6 4 [8]   J Lu
E Sema 		3 2
  J Lu
E Sema 		1 6 [10] 1 N Kichenok
M Minella 		715 6
3 V Wongteanchai
Z Yang 		3 6 [10] 3 V Wongteanchai
Z Yang 		613 1
  Y Chiang
A Myers 		6 2 [8] 3 V Wongteanchai
Z Yang 		6 6
  M Inoue
E Laine 		1 5   Q Ye
L Zhang 		2 2
  Q Ye
L Zhang 		6 7 1 N Kichenok
M Minella 		6 5 [7]
  X You
L Zhu 		6 6   X You
L Zhu 		2 7 [10]
  J Elie
S Peers 		3 3   X You
L Zhu 		5 6 [11]
Q T Andrianjafitrimo
M Imanishi 		4 1 4 C-y Hsu
H Kuwata 		7 4 [9]
4 C-y Hsu
H Kuwata 		6 6   X You
L Zhu 		7 6
  T Patterson
O Rogowska 		3 6 [10]   T Patterson
O Rogowska 		5 4
WC A Bai
N Bains 		6 4 [8]   T Patterson
O Rogowska 		6 6
  A Omae
Y Tanaka 		5 3 2 X Han
K Piter 		3 4
2 X Han
K Piter 		7 6
gollark: It's about as useful as the contents of my "random files" folder, which contains everything from zipped backups of my pastebin to some random textbooks Springer temporarily made free to some papers which looked interesting to HTML file archives of interesting web content.
gollark: There's not even a "README" explaining why any of the stuff in it is there and providing an overview, this *is not readable*.
gollark: If you want anyone to actually evaluate whatever claims you're making, actually explain them rather than just dumping a random trashpile on them.
gollark: There is not anything coherent to this other than a pile of random papers.
gollark: I can't "focus on the evidence" because I have no idea what this is saying.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.