2016 Heilbronner Neckarcup – Doubles

Doubles
	2016 Heilbronner Neckarcup
Champion	Sander Arends; Tristan-Samuel Weissborn
Runner-up	Nikola Mektić; Antonio Šančić
Final score	6–3, 6–4

Mateusz Kowalczyk and Igor Zelenay were the defending champions but chose to participate with different partners. Kowalczyk partnered Tomasz Bednarek while Zelenay partnered Rameez Junaid. Both failed to defend their title, with Kowalczyk losing to Zelenay in the first round and Zelenay losing to Sander Arends and Tristan-Samuel Weissborn in the quarterfinals.

Sander Arends and Tristan-Samuel Weissborn won the title after defeating Nikola Mektić and Antonio Šančić 6–3, 6–4 in the final.

Seeds

Julio Peralta / Horacio Zeballos (Quarterfinals)
Andrej Martin / Hans Podlipnik (Quarterfinals)
Ken Skupski / Neal Skupski (First round)
Rameez Junaid / Igor Zelenay (Quarterfinals)

Draw

Key

First Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals					Final

1	J Peralta H Zeballos	6	7
WC	A Beck Y Maden	2	5		1	J Peralta H Zeballos	6⁴	6	[5]
	N Mektić A Šančić	6	3	[10]		N Mektić A Šančić	7⁷	4	[10]
LL	I Sabanov M Sabanov	3	6	[5]							N Mektić A Šančić	6	6
3	K Skupski N Skupski	4	3								A Molteni MÁ Reyes-Varela	2	2
	M Arévalo F Škugor	6	6			M Arévalo F Škugor	3	2
	A Molteni MÁ Reyes-Varela	6	3	[10]		A Molteni MÁ Reyes-Varela	6	6
	R Harrison M Venus	4	6	[6]												N Mektić A Šančić	3	4
	F Moser M Zverev	6⁴	6⁸													S Arends T-S Weissborn	6	6
	S Arends T-S Weissborn	7⁷	7¹⁰			S Arends T-S Weissborn	2	6	[11]
	T Bednarek M Kowalczyk	3	1		4	R Junaid I Zelenay	6	4	[9]
4	R Junaid I Zelenay	6	6								S Arends T-S Weissborn	2	6	[10]
WC	D Brown O Otte	6	3	[10]						WC	D Brown O Otte	6	3	[5]
WC	K Krawietz S Stadler	3	6	[3]	WC	D Brown O Otte	6	6
	G Kretschmer A Satschko	6	1	[8]	2	A Martin H Podlipnik	4	4
2	A Martin H Podlipnik	1	6	[10]

gollark: Yes, I know. It doesn't depend on that.

gollark: You fractionally get 1 million and fractionally die.

gollark: Well, it's good if 1e6/n - (equivalent monetary cost of dying)/n > 0. Multiply both sides by n and it's trivial.

gollark: 1e6 = 1 million.

gollark: The expected value is 1e6/n - (equivalent monetary cost of dying)/n. So whether it is a good choice depends on whether (equivalent monetary cost of dying is greater than 1e6 euros, which is no.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.