2016 Hardee's Pro Classic – Singles

Singles
	2016 Hardee's Pro Classic
Champion	Rebecca Peterson
Runner-up	Taylor Townsend
Final score	6–4, 6–2

Louisa Chirico was the defending champion, but chose to participate in Stuttgart instead.

Rebecca Peterson won the title, defeating Taylor Townsend in the final, 6–4, 6–2.

Seeds

Anna Tatishvili (Quarterfinals)
Rebecca Peterson (Champion)
Alexandra Panova (Second round)
Jessica Pegula (Semifinals)
Elise Mertens (First round)
Sachia Vickery (Second round)
Julia Boserup (First round)
Katerina Stewart (Quarterfinals)

Main draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals				Final


	Alla Kudryavtseva	2	2

Q	Taylor Townsend	6	6
				Q	Taylor Townsend	4	2

				2	Rebecca Peterson	6	6
4	Jessica Pegula	1	6²

2	Rebecca Peterson	6	7⁷

Top half

First round					Second round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals

1	A Tatishvili	7	6
Q	R Kingsley	5	3		1	A Tatishvili	6	6
	C Bellis	6	4	6		C Bellis	3	4
	J Loeb	3	6	3						1	A Tatishvili	6	2	4
	A Kudryavtseva	6	6								A Kudryavtseva	2	6	6
Q	O Ianchuk	3	2			A Kudryavtseva	6⁶	6	6
	A Muhammad	6	6			A Muhammad	7⁸	4	3
7	J Boserup	1	4													A Kudryavtseva	2	2
3	A Panova	5	6	6											Q	T Townsend	6	6
	C Perrin	7	1	1	3	A Panova	4	3
WC	C Liu	6	6⁶	1	Q	T Townsend	6	6
Q	T Townsend	2	7⁸	6						Q	T Townsend	6	4	6
	C Pella	2	6⁵								J Brady	2	6	3
	J Brady	6	7⁷			J Brady	6	7⁷
WC	L Albanese	2	1		6	S Vickery	3	6⁴
6	S Vickery	6	6

Bottom half

First round					Second round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals

8	K Stewart	7	6
	S Foretz	5	1		8	K Stewart	6	2	6
	R Anderson	1	1		Q	V Flink	4	6	2
Q	V Flink	6	6							8	K Stewart	3	6	3
LL	O Rogowska	2	6	4						4	J Pegula	6	3	6
	D Lao	6	1	6		D Lao	4	3
WC	S Kenin	6	4	2	4	J Pegula	6	6
4	J Pegula	3	6	6											4	J Pegula	1	6²
5	E Mertens	6¹	3												2	R Peterson	6	7⁷
	M Sanchez	7⁷	6			M Sanchez	6	6
WC	A Sanford	6	0		WC	A Sanford	3	4
	A Gámiz	3	0^r								M Sanchez	0	3
PR	U Eikeri	1	6	2						2	R Peterson	6	6
	B Pera	6	3	6		B Pera	2	6	2
	J Jakšić	3	1		2	R Peterson	6	4	6
2	R Peterson	6	6

gollark: What IS free will anyway?

gollark: Is that not *somewhat* generalizing it?

gollark: You'd expect, though, that if universe-level ontotechnological meddling was possible, someone would already have done it.Unless they already have.

gollark: Ah, but you could also add magic energy destroyers to your laws of physics.

gollark: Um. Wow.

References

Main draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.