2016 Guzzini Challenger – Singles

Mirza Bašić was the defending champion but chose not to participate.

Singles
2016 Guzzini Challenger
Champion Illya Marchenko
Runner-up Ilya Ivashka
Final score6–4, 6–4
Main article: 2016 Guzzini Challenger

Illya Marchenko won the title after defeating Ilya Ivashka 6–4, 6–4 in the final.

Seeds
  1. Evgeny Donskoy (Semifinals)
  2. Illya Marchenko (Champion)
  3. Márton Fucsovics (Semifinals)
  4. Eduardo Struvay (First round)
  5. Ruben Bemelmans (Quarterfinals)
  6. Luca Vanni (Quarterfinals)
  7. Andrey Rublev (Second round)
  8. Aldin Šetkić (Second round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Evgeny Donskoy 7 68 2
Ilya Ivashka 5 710 6
Ilya Ivashka 4 4
2 Illya Marchenko 6 6
3 Márton Fucsovics 3 2
2 Illya Marchenko 6 6

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 E Donskoy 6 6
F Gaio 3 2 1 E Donskoy 65 77 77
PR A Olivetti 6 6 PR A Olivetti 77 65 65
WC Riccardo Bonadio 4 4 1 E Donskoy 3 6 6
LL D Zhyrmont 65 6 77 6 L Vanni 6 3 0
WC A Vavassori 77 3 65 LL D Zhyrmont 1 77 3
M Przysiężny 77 3 5 6 L Vanni 6 62 6
6 L Vanni 65 6 7 1 E Donskoy 7 68 2
4 E Struvay 3 3 I Ivashka 5 710 6
Edoardo Eremin 6 6 E Eremin 64 63
A Menéndez-Maceiras 6 6 A Menéndez-Maceiras 77 77
Y Mertens 1 2 A Menéndez-Maceiras 62 6 4
M Viola 3 1 I Ivashka 77 2 6
I Ivashka 6 6 I Ivashka 6 5 6
Q V Galović 3 63 8 A Šetkić 4 7 3
8 A Šetkić 6 77

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 R Bemelmans 7 2 77
LL R Boutillier 5 6 63 5 R Bemelmans 77 7
A Sidorenko 61 6 3 Q A Bublik 63 5
Q A Bublik 77 3 6 5 R Bemelmans 612 6 62
SE G Mager 65 6 65 3 M Fucsovics 714 4 77
Q M Delić 77 3 77 Q M Delić 1 5
Q F Veger 2 7 3 3 M Fucsovics 6 7
3 M Fucsovics 6 5 6 3 M Fucsovics 3 2
7/WC A Rublev 6 6 2 I Marchenko 6 6
R Ortega Olmedo 2 4 7/WC A Rublev 4 5
A Bega 7 6 A Bega 6 7
A Metreveli 5 3 A Bega 1 3
F Dustov 6 6 2 I Marchenko 6 6
WC Antonio Massara 3 3 F Dustov 0r
M Janvier 1 78 64 2 I Marchenko 2
2 I Marchenko 6 66 77
gollark: The Pi 4 has 4 A72 cores and the RP64 has 2 A72 ones plus 4 A53 ones, but they're clocked higher. I don't know which of those is actually *better*, since I haven't checked benchmarks.
gollark: There's also Pine's own RockPro64, which I think is ~~about as fast~~ somewhat faster as the Pi4 CPU-wise, and the ODROID N2, which is probably one of the most powerful reasonably cheap ARM SBCs about.
gollark: The RPi4 has a better CPU and GPU than the 3, no idea if it can run that.
gollark: <@140164484827185152> On the smart TV thing, I've heard that they're sold for less than "dumb" ones because the manufacturers make money off selling data from them.
gollark: London gets stupidly fast (10Gbit in some places, even) fibre, but most of the UK isn't London.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.