2016 Coupe Banque Nationale – Singles

Annika Beck was the defending champion, but lost in the first round to Barbora Štefková.

Singles
2016 Coupe Banque Nationale
Champion Océane Dodin
Runner-up Lauren Davis
Final score6–4, 6–3
Main article: 2016 Coupe Banque Nationale

Océane Dodin won her maiden WTA singles title, defeating Lauren Davis 6–4, 6–3 in the final.

Seeds
  1. Eugenie Bouchard (Second round)
  2. Annika Beck (First round)
  3. Mirjana Lučić-Baroni (First round)
  4. Julia Görges (First round)
  5. Naomi Broady (First round)
  6. Mona Barthel (First round)
  7. Evgeniya Rodina (Second round)
  8. Samantha Crawford (Second round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
Q Lauren Davis 6 62 6
Q Tereza Martincová 3 77 2
Q Lauren Davis 4 3
  Océane Dodin 6 6
  Julia Boserup 4 6 2
  Océane Dodin 6 3 6

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 E Bouchard 6 6
M Minella 3 4 1 E Bouchard 2 3
A Kudryavtseva 7 6 A Kudryavtseva 6 6
V Cepede Royg 5 4 A Kudryavtseva 3 64
WC C Zhao 3 2 Q L Davis 6 77
Q L Davis 6 6 Q L Davis 6 6
Y Bonaventure 65 77 4 8 S Crawford 4 1
8 S Crawford 77 64 6 Q L Davis 6 62 6
4 J Görges 4 61 Q T Martincová 3 77 2
E Alexandrova 6 77 E Alexandrova 4 6 4
Q T Martincová 4 7 6 Q T Martincová 6 1 6
Q B Krejčíková 6 5 4 Q T Martincová 6 79
WC A Wozniak 3 6 2 J Pegula 3 67
J Pegula 6 3 6 J Pegula 77 7
WC F Abanda 79 6 WC F Abanda 62 5
6 M Barthel 67 4

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
7 E Rodina 6 6
Q J Loeb 2 2 7 E Rodina 4 3
A Sadiković 1 3 J Boserup 6 6
J Boserup 6 6 J Boserup 77 6
C Bellis 6 6 C Bellis 60 4
Q A Hesse 3 2 C Bellis 6 4 6
Q D Lao 6 6 Q D Lao 4 6 3
3 M Lučić-Baroni 4 2 J Boserup 4 6 2
5 N Broady 6 4 4 O Dodin 6 3 6
O Dodin 2 6 6 O Dodin 6 6
S Vickery 77 63 79 S Vickery 4 4
PM Țig 65 77 67 O Dodin 6 6
E Kostova 1 2 A Van Uytvanck 2 4
A Van Uytvanck 6 6 A Van Uytvanck 6 6
LL B Štefková 2 7 6 LL B Štefková 4 3
2 A Beck 6 5 3

Qualifying

Seeds
  1. Lauren Davis (Qualified)
  2. Amandine Hesse (Qualified)
  3. Barbora Štefková (Qualifying competition, Lucky loser)
  4. Lucie Hradecká (Qualifying competition)
  5. Jovana Jakšić (Qualifying competition)
  6. Alexandra Panova (Qualifying competition)
  7. Mayo Hibi (Qualifying competition)
  8. Robin Anderson (First round)
  9. Paula Kania (Qualifying competition)
  10. Sesil Karatantcheva (First round)
  11. Jamie Loeb (Qualified)
  12. Tereza Martincová (Qualified)

Qualifiers
  1. Lauren Davis
  2. Amandine Hesse
  3. Barbora Krejčíková
  4. Jamie Loeb
  5. Danielle Lao
  6. Tereza Martincová

Lucky losers
  1. Barbora Štefková

Qualifying draw

First qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
1 Lauren Davis 6 6
  Marie Bouzková 4 3
1 Lauren Davis 6 6
7 Mayo Hibi 1 3
  Sanaz Marand 6 3 3
7 Mayo Hibi 3 6 6

Second qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
2 Amandine Hesse 6 77
WC Elena Bovina 4 63
2 Amandine Hesse 2 6 7
9 Paula Kania 6 4 5
  Andrea Hlaváčková 4 1
9 Paula Kania 6 6

Third qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
3 Barbora Štefková 6 6
WC Catherine Leduc 1 4
3 Barbora Štefková 4 1
  Barbora Krejčíková 6 6
  Barbora Krejčíková 6 6
8 Robin Anderson 3 2

Fourth qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
4 Lucie Hradecká 6 66 6
  Ana Sofía Sánchez 2 78 3
4 Lucie Hradecká 4 4
11 Jamie Loeb 6 6
  Jennifer Elie 3 6 4
11 Jamie Loeb 6 1 6

Fifth qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
5 Jovana Jakšić 6 6
WC Mireille Moreau 1 1
5 Jovana Jakšić 2 64
  Danielle Lao 6 77
  Danielle Lao 2 6 6
10 Sesil Karatantcheva 6 2 2

Sixth qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
6 Alexandra Panova 77 6
  Maria Sanchez 65 2
6 Alexandra Panova 62 64
12 Tereza Martincová 77 77
WC Charlotte Robillard-Millette 4 1
12 Tereza Martincová 6 6
gollark: Or to have people be paid per use of a thing out of a pool of input money, like Kindle Unlimited and whatever.
gollark: One idea for that is to have people pay upfront kickstarter-style, but that has its own problems too.
gollark: I don't really know how intellectual property issues "should" work, although I don't think the current approach of "just pretend they work like non-duplicable physical goods as much as possible" is a very good one.
gollark: I'm not saying that (Doctor Dan might be partly), just that it's not the same as theft and probably quite complex.
gollark: That seems a confusing line of thinking, it's not like the creator actually loses something like they would in actual theft.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.