2016 Chengdu Challenger – Singles
Jason Jung won the title, defeating Rubén Ramírez Hidalgo in the final, 6–4, 6–2.
Singles | |
---|---|
2016 Chengdu Challenger | |
Champion | ![]() |
Runner-up | ![]() |
Final score | 6–4, 6–2 |
This was the first edition of the tournament.
Seeds
Konstantin Kravchuk (First round) Go Soeda (First round) Alexander Kudryavtsev (First round) Wu Di (Second round) Zhang Ze (Quarterfinals) Enrique López-Pérez (Second round) Lee Duck-hee (Semifinals) Pere Riba (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
7 | ![]() | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
Top half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() | 77 | 62 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 62 | 77 | 77 | ![]() | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 2 | 7 | 6 | Q | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 5 | 3 | Q | ![]() | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
PR | ![]() | 5 | 4 | 7 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 7 | 6 | WC | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 3 | 4 | 7 | ![]() | 6 | 2 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | 7 | ![]() | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() | 1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 1r | 4 | ![]() | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 2 | 4 | ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 3 | 6 | 6 | Q | ![]() | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 3 | 2 | Q | ![]() | 3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 2 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 |
Bottom half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | ![]() | 6 | 3 | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 3 | 6 | 78 | Q | ![]() | 1 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 1 | 6 | 4 | ![]() | 6 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 4 | 6 | Q | ![]() | 6 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() | 4 | 63 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 5 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 77 | 65 | 6 | ![]() | 7 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() | 65 | 77 | 1 | Q | ![]() | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | ![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 5 | 3 | 5 | ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 64 | 6 | ![]() | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 4 | 77 | 4 | 5 | ![]() | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 77 | 610 | 0 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 64 | 712 | 6 | ![]() | 3 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 77 | 4 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() | 65 | 6 | 4 |
gollark: I can't say I'm very *effective* at maximizing future expected [WHATEVER NEUROCHEMICAL].
gollark: It should probably fit, try it and see.
gollark: If you want to do something OOPy, which the hooks are for, then you should at least use the mechanisms the language actually provides for it.
gollark: I've always found the React hooks vaguely horrific.
gollark: Presumably if you had a really good model for audio/vision/whatever you could just transfer-learn it (or part of it, for efficiency) onto whatever subtask you want.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.