2016 Capri Watch Cup – Singles

Daniel Muñoz de la Nava was the defending champion, but decided not to defend his title.

Singles
2016 Capri Watch Cup
Champion Jozef Kovalík
Runner-up Arthur De Greef
Final score6–3, 6–2

Jozef Kovalík won the title, defeating Arthur De Greef 6–3, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds

  1. Filip Krajinović (Second round)
  2. Rogério Dutra Silva (Second round)
  3. Jan-Lennard Struff (First round)
  4. Thomas Fabbiano (First round)
  5. Roberto Carballés Baena (Quarterfinals)
  6. Gastão Elias (Semifinals)
  7. Andrej Martin (First round)
  8. Mirza Bašić (Second round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
  Arthur De Greef 6 6
Marius Copil 3 2
  Arthur De Greef 3 2
Jozef Kovalík 6 6
6 Gastão Elias 1 78 3
Jozef Kovalík 6 66 6

Top half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 F Krajinović 5 6 6
Q J Reister 7 4 2 1 F Krajinović 4 5
A De Greef 7 6 A De Greef 6 7
L Vanni 5 4 A De Greef 77 7
A Giannessi 6 6 5 R Carballés Baena 62 3
H Podlipnik 0 2 A Giannessi 2 7 3
WC F Gaio 6 2 3 5 R Carballés Baena 6 5 6
5 R Carballés Baena 3 6 6 A De Greef 6 6
3 J-L Struff 64 6 4 M Copil 3 2
WC G Mager 77 4 6 WC G Mager 4 3
M Copil 6 4 6 M Copil 6 6
Q D Kuzmanov 3 6 2 M Copil 6 6
Q F Cipolla 1 3 WC S Caruso 0 2
WC S Caruso 6 6 WC S Caruso 6 67 6
A Arnaboldi 5 6 4 8 M Bašić 4 79 2
8 M Bašić 7 4 6

Bottom half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 G Elias 4 6 6
I Sijsling 6 2 1 6 G Elias 7 6
M Donati 3 77 2 WC S Napolitano 5 2
WC S Napolitano 6 65 6 6 G Elias 6 6
A Ungur 6 78 U Ignatik 2 2
SE A Sidorenko 4 66 A Ungur 5 2
U Ignatik 6 61 7 U Ignatik 7 6
4 T Fabbiano 4 77 5 6 G Elias 1 78 3
7 A Martin 1 3 J Kovalík 6 66 6
F Volandri 6 6 F Volandri 7 4 6
Q A Vatutin 4 5 G Naso 5 6 1
G Naso 6 7 F Volandri 4 77 2
M Fucsovics 3 0 J Kovalík 6 64 6
J Kovalík 6 6 J Kovalík 78 6
A Golubev 1 0 2 R Dutra Silva 66 4
2 R Dutra Silva 6 6
gollark: I think they mean "exists" as "is a thing which can theoretically be implemented".
gollark: So you might not be able to reach consensus.
gollark: I think the biggest issue is that any system doing it is either going to have a central authority or some sort of web-of-trust-y federated model, and it might be possible for some groups to just completely discard votes from people they don't like.
gollark: Decentralized vote counting is... nontrivial, but probably possible.
gollark: You *can* do direct democracy.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.