2016 Abierto de Puebla – Doubles
This was the first edition of the tournament since 2009.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 Abierto de Puebla | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 3–6, 6–2, [12–10] |
Marcus Daniell and Artem Sitak won the title, defeating Santiago González and Mate Pavić 3–6, 6–2, [12–10] in the final.
Seeds
Santiago González / Mate Pavić (Final) Guillermo Durán / Horacio Zeballos (First round) Marcus Daniell / Artem Sitak (Champions) Gero Kretschmer / Alexander Satschko (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 60 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 77 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 77 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 65 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 63 | 61 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 62 | [9] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [6] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 77 | [11] | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [12] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 65 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 2 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 65 | 5 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 6 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 7 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 7 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [6] |
gollark: What with WebAssembly, WebGL, and all the various web-whatever standards for interacting with native stuff.
gollark: The web platform and all its excessive features might actually be helpful for that, since you can probably get regular native-application-like behavior in a browser regardless of OS.
gollark: Windows: "Universal" Windows Platform, Google: Chrome OS/Android apps, Apple: their Mac app store thingy.
gollark: Software support? Probably. It doesn't help that each OS vendor is trying to lock you into their walled garden now.
gollark: Arch is rolling release, and I think any breaking of the package manager would also likely mess up everything else *anyway*.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.