2015 CopperWynd Pro Women's Challenge – Singles

Samantha Crawford won the inaugural edition, defeating Viktorija Golubic in the final, 6–3, 4–6, 6–2.

Singles
2015 CopperWynd Pro Women's Challenge
Champion Samantha Crawford
Runner-up Viktorija Golubic
Final score6–3, 4–6, 6–2
Main article: 2015 CopperWynd Pro Women's Challenge

This was a new event in the ITF Women's Circuit.

Seeds
  1. Tatjana Maria (First round)
  2. Anna Tatishvili (First round)
  3. Naomi Broady (Second round)
  4. Nicole Gibbs (Second round)
  5. Rebecca Peterson (Semifinals)
  6. Julia Glushko (Quarterfinals)
  7. Alla Kudryavtseva (Withdrew)
  8. Verónica Cepede Royg (Quarterfinals)

Main draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
  Viktorija Golubic 6 6
WC Robin Anderson 3 3
  Viktorija Golubic 3 6 2
  Samantha Crawford 6 4 6
5 Rebecca Peterson 6 65 62
  Samantha Crawford 4 77 77

Top half
First round Second round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 T Maria 4 66
Q J Cako 6 78 Q J Cako 2 6 4
  V Golubic 7 1 V Golubic 6 1 6
  J Boserup 5 0r V Golubic 7 6
  V Rodríguez 6 1 6 V Rodríguez 5 1
  K Stewart 2 6 3 V Rodríguez 6 6
  M Irigoyen 3 4 LL S Chang 2 0
LL S Chang 6 6 V Golubic 6 6
4 N Gibbs 6 6 WC R Anderson 3 3
  G Dabrowski 1 1 4 N Gibbs 5 7 3
WC D Lao 5 1 WC R Anderson 7 5 6
WC R Anderson 7 6 WC R Anderson 6 4 6
  M Zacarías 6 7 8 V Cepede Royg 3 6 3
  M Sanchez 3 5 M Zacarías 2 3
  S Pe'er 4 6 1 8 V Cepede Royg 6 6
8 V Cepede Royg 6 2 6

Bottom half
First round Second round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 R Peterson 77 6
Q S Santamaria 64 1 5 R Peterson 6 0 77
  G Min 7 3 6 G Min 3 6 65
  J Brady 5 6 4 5 R Peterson 4 6 6
Q S Fichman 4 2 WC V King 6 4 2
WC V King 6 6 WC V King 3 6 7
Q F Abanda 7 1 1 3 N Broady 6 3 5
3 N Broady 5 6 6 5 R Peterson 6 65 62
6 J Glushko 6 6 S Crawford 4 77 77
WC K McKenzie 4 1 6 J Glushko 6 6
  J Jakšić 7 77 J Jakšić 1 3
  S Vogt 5 62 6 J Glushko 5 3
  S Crawford 4 78 6 S Crawford 7 6
  K Ahn 6 66 3 S Crawford 6 4 6
  E Kostova 6 5 78 E Kostova 4 6 3
2 A Tatishvili 2 7 66
gollark: > As long as our hypothetical Blub programmer is looking down the power continuum, he knows he's looking down. Languages less powerful than Blub are obviously less powerful, because they're missing some feature he's used to. But when our hypothetical Blub programmer looks in the other direction, up the power continuum, he doesn't realize he's looking up. What he sees are merely weird languages. He probably considers them about equivalent in power to Blub, but with all this other hairy stuff thrown in as well. Blub is good enough for him, because he thinks in Blub.
gollark: Imagine YOU are a BLUB programmer.
gollark: Imagine a language which is UTTERLY generic in expressiveness and whatever, called blub.
gollark: There's the whole "blub paradox" thing.
gollark: Assembly FAIRLY unbased.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.