2014 Napa Valley Challenger – Doubles
Bobby Reynolds and John-Patrick Smith were the defending champions, but Reynolds chose not to participate. Smith partnered with Adam Hubble and lost in the quarterfinals to Alex Kuznetsov and Nils Langer.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2014 Napa Valley Challenger | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6(7–0), 6–1 |
Peter Polansky and Adil Shamasdin won the title, defeating Bradley Klahn and Tim Smyczek 7–6(7–0), 6–1 in the final.
Seeds
Peter Polansky / Adil Shamasdin (Champions) Bradley Klahn / Tim Smyczek (Final) Sekou Bangoura / Vahid Mirzadeh (Quarterfinals) Tennys Sandgren / Rhyne Williams (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 77 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 63 | [7] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||
PR | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | PR | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 64 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [11] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 60 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [9] | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 1 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [3] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 6 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 1 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 78 | [7] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 66 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: I disagree with saying "someone" for non-people entities.
gollark: There are various problems with this:- massive increase of complexity in guns- you would need to recharge it constantly, and it would need batteries and such, and would generally be a hassle- GPS spoofing (possibly just jamming, depending on design) would stop guns working- people could probably just remove the geofencing bit- how are you planning to keep the "do not shoot here" lists updated on all of them?
gollark: I sent this mere *hours* ago.
gollark: Does the particular context of it change the meaning much? Or imply that you should only do that sometimes?
gollark: Language is hard, since it often deals with things which are hard to rigorously define in the first place, is subject to bizarre evolutionary pressures, and is often manipulated for argumentative gain.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.