2013 Viccourt Cup – Doubles

Lyudmyla and Nadiya Kichenok were the defending champions, having won the event in 2012, but they lost in the quarterfinals.

Doubles
2013 Viccourt Cup
Champions Yuliya Beygelzimer
Renata Voráčová
Runners-up Vesna Dolonc
Alexandra Panova
Final score6–1, 6–4

Yuliya Beygelzimer and Renata Voráčová won the tournament, defeating Vesna Dolonc and Alexandra Panova in the final, 6–1, 6–4.

Seeds

  1. Vesna Dolonc / Alexandra Panova (final)
  2. Yuliya Beygelzimer / Renata Voráčová (champions)
  3. Lyudmyla Kichenok / Nadiya Kichenok (quarterfinals)
  4. Paula Kania / Polina Pekhova (semifinals)

Draw

Key

First round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 V Dolonc
A Panova
6 4 [10]
  L Marozava
C Shakovets
1 6 [3] 1 V Dolonc
A Panova
6 6
  J Cohen
E Yashina
6 6   J Cohen
E Yashina
1 1
WC K Kerimbayeva
A Petrova
2 3 1 V Dolonc
A Panova
6 4 [10]
4 P Kania
P Pekhova
6 6 4 P Kania
P Pekhova
4 6 [8]
WC D Gavrilova
H Ploskina
0 3 4 P Kania
P Pekhova
6 6
  N Abduraimova
I Kremen
65 2 WC A Fedoryshyn
A Kalinina
1 3
WC A Fedoryshyn
A Kalinina
77 6 1 V Dolonc
A Panova
1 4
  E Bychkova
K Pervak
6 63 [10] 2 Y Beygelzimer
R Voráčová
6 6
  A Khabibulina
A Vasylyeva
4 77 [6]   E Bychkova
K Pervak
64 6 [11]
  Kr Plíšková
E Svitolina
2 6 [7] 3 L Kichenok
N Kichenok
77 3 [9]
3 L Kichenok
N Kichenok
6 3 [10]   E Bychkova
K Pervak
0 1
  V Ivakhnenko
K Kozlova
6 4 [8] 2 Y Beygelzimer
R Voráčová
6 6
  V Kapshay
A Krunić
4 6 [10]   V Kapshay
A Krunić
1 5
  A Fomina
S Shapatava
2 3 2 Y Beygelzimer
R Voráčová
6 7
2 Y Beygelzimer
R Voráčová
6 6
gollark: Oh, and "you constantly just refer people to giant sets of papers and random YouTube videos".
gollark: Also "you aren't using actual evidence" and "you're constantly shifting the goalposts" and "you're not even bothering to explain your claims and just expect people to infer them from random papers" and "you say stupidly vague things and cite papers for evidence because they sound vaguely related".
gollark: Your quote, not the video which I have ignored.
gollark: Well, it's hardly a good-faith attempt to explain a point or something, and you're unlikely to make anyone actually do much about it by saying it again.
gollark: > Ah, yes, this video says saint Einstein is wrong therefore he is a moron indeed.> Ah, yesis generally used to precede "gotcha" sort of things i.e. snappy "arguments" which don't really mean much> saint Einsteinis basically you just pushing the whole "science = religion" thing you like

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.