2013 Australian Open – Men Legends' Doubles

Draw

References

Key

Final

Group A

Group B

Men Legends' Doubles
	2013 Australian Open
Champions	;
Runners-up	;

	Woodbridge Woodforde	Bahrami Ferreira	Eltingh Haarhuis	Cahill Wilander Arthurs	RR W–L	Set W–L	Game W–L	Standings
Todd Woodbridge Mark Woodforde		7–6^(19–17), 6–4	7–5, 3–6, [10–3]	6–2, 6–4 (w/ Wilander)	3–0	6–1	36–27	1
Mansour Bahrami Wayne Ferreira	6–7^(17–19), 4–6		3–6, 4–6	6–2, 4–6, [10–8] (w/ Arthurs)	1–2	2–5	28–33	3
Jacco Eltingh Paul Haarhuis	5–7, 6–3, [3–10]	6–3, 6–4		7–6^(7–4), 6–2 (w/ Wilander)	2–1	5–2	36–26	2
Darren Cahill Mats Wilander Wayne Arthurs	2–6, 4–6 (w/ Wilander)	2–6, 6–4, [8–10] (w/ Arthurs)	6–7^(4–7), 2–6 (w/ Wilander)		0–2 0–1	0–4 1–2	14–25 8–11	4 X

Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.

	Ivanišević Pioline	Forget Leconte	Arthurs Cash Ivanišević	Enqvist Santoro	RR W–L	Set W–L	Game W–L	Standings
Goran Ivanišević Cédric Pioline		7–5, 5–7, [10–6]	6–4, 6–7^(8–10), [5–10] (w/ Arthurs)	6–1, 2–6, [8–10]	1–2	4–5	33–32	3
Guy Forget Henri Leconte	5–7, 7–5, [6–10]		6–7^(6–8), 6–2, [8–10] (w/ Ivanišević)	6–4, 4–6, [10–7]	1–2	4–5	35–33	2
Wayne Arthurs Pat Cash Goran Ivanišević	4–6, 7–6^(10–8), [10–5] (w/ Arthurs)	7–6^(8–6), 2–6, [10–8] (w/ Ivanišević)		7–6^(7–5), 6–7^(3–7), [10–7] (w/ Arthurs)	2–0 1–0	4–2 2–1	26–25 10–12	1 X
Thomas Enqvist Fabrice Santoro	1–6, 6–2, [10–8]	4–6, 6–4, [7–10]	6–7^(5–7), 7–6^(7–3), [7–10] (w/ Arthurs)		1–2	4–5	31–33	4

Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.

gollark: They need to be able to operate independently of the network, or everything will go horribly wrong if they go into a tunnel, or there's a temporary outage.

gollark: Honestly it doesn't seem useful for *that*, either.

gollark: I can see it being used for specialty applications like that, sure, but it does *not* seem useful in a generic router-type device.

gollark: It honestly seems mostly pointless though, given that it doesn't go through walls and apparently works at roughly... cable ranges.

gollark: I've never heard it called WiFi type C, I thought it was just 802.11ad or something.

Todd Woodbridge
Mark Woodforde

Wayne Arthurs
Pat Cash

Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.