2012 ATP Challenger Tour Finals – Singles
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was the champion in 2011, but did not qualify for the event in 2012, since he played mostly ATP World Tour tournaments in that season.
Guido Pella defeated Adrian Ungur 6–3, 6–7(4–7), 7–6(7–4) in the final to win the title.
Singles | |
---|---|
2012 ATP Challenger Tour Finals | |
Champion | |
Runner-up | |
Final score | 6–3, 6–7(4–7), 7–6(7–4) |
Seeds
Thomaz Bellucci (Round Robin, withdrew because of a shoulder injury) Paolo Lorenzi (Round Robin) Victor Hănescu (Semifinals) Rubén Ramírez Hidalgo (Round Robin) Aljaž Bedene (Semifinals) Adrian Ungur (Final) Guido Pella (Champion) Gastão Elias (Round Robin)
Alternates
Thiago Alves (Replaced Thomaz Bellucci, Round Robin) Rogério Dutra da Silva (Did not play)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
5 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||
6 | 3 | 77 | 64 | ||||||||||
7 | 6 | 64 | 77 | ||||||||||
3 | 63 | 2 | |||||||||||
7 | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||
Green Group
RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||||||
1/WC 9/Alt |
3–6, 6–7(3–7) (w/ Alves) |
7–6(8–6), 6–2 (w/ Alves) |
6–4, 6–7(5–7), 5–7 (w/ Bellucci) |
0–1 1–1 |
1–2 (33.3%) 2–2 (50.0%) |
17–18 (48.6%) 22–21 (51.2%) |
X 4 | ||
4 | 6–3, 7–6(7–3) (w/ Alves) |
4–6, 6–4, 2–6 | 6–7(4–7), 2–6 | 1–2 | 3–4 (42.9%) | 33–38 (46.5%) |
3 | ||
6 | 6–7(6–8), 2–6 (w/ Alves) |
6–4, 4–6, 6–2 | 4–6, 7–6(8–6), 7–6(7–5) | 2–1 | 4–4 (50.0%) | 42–43 (49.4%) |
1 | ||
7 | 4–6, 7–6(7–5), 7–5 (w/ Bellucci) |
7–6(7–4), 6–2 | 6–4, 6–7(6–8), 6–7(5–7) | 2–1 | 5–3 (62.5%) | 49–43 (53.3%) |
2 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
Yellow Group
RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||||||
2 | 3–6, 4–6 | 1–6, 3–6 | 7–5, 6–2 | 1–2 | 2–4 (33.3%) | 24–31 (43.6%) |
3 | ||
3 | 6–3, 6–4 | 7–6(7–5), 7–6(7–5) | 6–3, 5–7, 3–6 | 2–1 | 5–2 (71.4%) | 40–35 (53.3%) |
1 | ||
5 | 6–1, 6–3 | 6–7(5–7), 6–7(5–7) | 6–3, 6–7(5–7), 6–3 | 2–1 | 4–3 (57.1%) | 42–31 (57.5%) |
2 | ||
8 | 5–7, 2–6 | 3–6, 7–5, 6–3 | 3–6, 7–6(7–5), 3–6 | 1–2 | 3–5 (37.5%) | 36–45 (44.4%) |
4 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
gollark: I actually have a similar thing on my desk for whatever historical reason.
gollark: This is roughly correct but you forgot the anthropic principle.
gollark: If that could happen it would happen to all words, thus nullifying apioforms' advantage.
gollark: Doubtful.
gollark: People like it.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.