2011 UniCredit Czech Open – Singles
Jan Hájek was the defending champion, but he was eliminated by Mikhail Youzhny in the second round.
Yuri Schukin won this title, after defeating Flavio Cipolla 6–4, 4–6, 6–0 in the final.
Singles | |
---|---|
2011 UniCredit Czech Open | |
Champion | |
Runner-up | |
Final score | 6–4, 4–6, 6–0 |
Seeds
Mikhail Youzhny (Quarterfinals, retired due to left foot injury) Tommy Robredo (withdrew) Andreas Seppi (Quarterfinals) Daniel Gimeno-Traver (First Round) Lu Yen-hsun (First Round) Radek Štěpánek (Semifinals) Carlos Berlocq (First Round) Filippo Volandri (Second Round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||
6 | 4 | 6 | |||||||||||
4 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
5 | 69 | ||||||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Top Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/WC | 7 | 3 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 5 | 6 | 5 | 1/WC | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 1/WC | 6 | 1r | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3/WC | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 2 | 3/WC | 6 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 3/WC | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 5 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 6 |
Bottom Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 2 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 6 | 67 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 65 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/WC | 2 | 4 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 7 | 6 | Q | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 64 | 4 | Q | 4 | 0r | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LL | 66 | 2 |
gollark: It also actually has working autoreconnect.
gollark: SPUDNET is the Super PotatOS Update/Debug NETwork.
gollark: The HV channels, I mean.
gollark: Do you really want to go there? *Really*?
gollark: Skynet has:- very simple publish/subscribe mechanism- actual protocol documentation- good performance- working client codeSPUDNET has:- vastly complicated node.js monolith which fails to scale- client code rewritten repeatedly because it's more complex and needs different environment things- documentation scattered across random Discord channels, some of which doesn't mention important features, plus similarly scattered code samples- 17249182649124 kilofeatures such as private channels, comm mode, the reporting system, HTTP-only mode- better acronym- potatOS
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.