2011 The Hague Open – Singles

Denis Gremelmayr was the defending champion but decided not to participate.
Steve Darcis won in the final 6–3, 4–6, 6–2 against Marsel İlhan.

Singles
2011 The Hague Open
Champion Steve Darcis
Runner-up Marsel İlhan
Final score6–3, 4–6, 6–2
Main article: 2011 The Hague Open

Seeds
  1. Marsel İlhan (Final)
  2. Steve Darcis (Champion)
  3. Éric Prodon (Quarterfinals)
  4. Marc Gicquel (Second Round)
  5. Stéphane Robert (First Round)
  6. Teymuraz Gabashvili (Second Round)
  7. Ivo Minář (Quarterfinals)
  8. Julian Reister (First Round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Marsel İlhan 1 6 6
  Augustin Gensse 6 3 1
1 Marsel İlhan 3 6 2
2 Steve Darcis 6 4 6
  Dušan Lojda 1 5  
2 Steve Darcis 6 7  

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 M İlhan 6 6  
  F del Bonis 3 2   1 M İlhan 6 2 6
Q P-H Herbert 4 2     D Muñoz-De La Nava 1 6 0
  D Muñoz-De La Nava 6 6   1 M İlhan 4 77 6
  J Dasnières de Veigy 5 3     D Goffin 6 63 4
  J Martí 7 6     J Martí 4 4  
  D Goffin 6 7   D Goffin 6 6  
5 S Robert 3 6   1 M İlhan 1 6 6
4 M Gicquel 6 77     A Gensse 6 3 1
Q J Paukku 3 63   4 M Gicquel 6 5 2
  H Heliövaara 5 2     A Gensse 1 7 6
  A Gensse 7 6     A Gensse 5 6 77
  J Lemke 5 1     M Middelkoop 7 0 66
  M Middelkoop 7 6     M Middelkoop 1 6 6
WC N van der Meer 5 2   6 T Gabashvili 6 1 2
6 T Gabashvili 7 6  

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 J Reister 77 4 0
  Jan-Lennard Struff 60 6 6   Jan-Lennard Struff 4 2  
Q M Rodrigues 4 3     D Lojda 6 6  
  D Lojda 6 6     D Lojda 6 6  
Q C Ebelthite 6 77   3 É Prodon 3 3  
  V Millot 4 65   Q C Ebelthite 4 4  
  Y Mertens 3 4   3 É Prodon 6 6  
3 É Prodon 6 6     D Lojda 1 5  
7/WC I Minář 6 6   2 S Darcis 6 7  
WC A van der Duim 1 2   7/WC I Minář 6 6  
  A Smirnov 6 7     A Smirnov 3 1  
  D Meffert 4 5   7/WC I Minář 6 2 5
  B Phau 6 6   2 S Darcis 0 6 7
WC Stephan Fransen 3 1     B Phau 6 0 3
  J Mertl 4 4   2 S Darcis 3 6 6
2 S Darcis 6 6  
gollark: Physicists do not sit around armchairishly going "hmm, what if stuff gets mass because of a 'field'?" and then getting it named after them.
gollark: If you are to actually make bold claims about theoretical physics instead of just paraphrasing random quantum things it would be beneficial to learn the relevant maths so you can understand the models.
gollark: I'm glad you are adding topic labels to this. This is very useful and I'd never have known this without you mentioning it.
gollark: Fascinating.
gollark: As far as I know this is only true of some things, and in general things just have mass because they have energy and ??? things occur with this.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.