2011 Orbetello Challenger – Singles

Pablo Andújar was the defending champion, but decided not to participate.
1st seed Filippo Volandri defeated Matteo Viola 4–6, 6–3, 6–2 in the final to win the tournament.

Singles
2011 Orbetello Challenger
Champion Filippo Volandri
Runner-up Matteo Viola
Final score4–6, 6–3, 6–2

Seeds

  1. Filippo Volandri (Champion)
  2. Thiemo de Bakker (Quarterfinals)
  3. Diego Junqueira (First Round)
  4. Mischa Zverev (First Round)
  5. Paolo Lorenzi (Quarterfinals)
  6. Édouard Roger-Vasselin (Semifinals)
  7. Benoît Paire (Quarterfinals)
  8. Florent Serra (Quarterfinals)

Draw

Key

Final four

Semifinals Final
          
1/WC Filippo Volandri 6 6  
  Romain Jouan 1 4  
1/WC Filippo Volandri 4 6 6
  Matteo Viola 6 3 2
  Matteo Viola 6 2 6
  Édouard Roger-Vasselin 3 6 4

Top Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1/WC F Volandri 6 6  
  A di Mauro 3 4   1/WC F Volandri 6 7  
Q M Authom 3 4     D Goffin 3 5  
  D Goffin 6 6   1/WC F Volandri 6 6  
WC M Trevisan 4 6 7 7 B Paire 4 4  
WC Marco Cecchinato 6 1 5 WC M Trevisan 61 2  
  L Mayer 6 65 1 7 B Paire 7 6  
7 B Paire 2 77 6 1/WC F Volandri 6 6  
4 M Zverev 61 1     R Jouan 1 4  
  S Vagnozzi 77 6     S Vagnozzi 3 6 4
  J Eysseric 2 2     R Jouan 6 1 6
  R Jouan 6 6     R Jouan 6 6  
Q I Cervantes-Huegun 6 6   5 P Lorenzi 1 4  
Q M Raditschnigg 4 3   Q I Cervantes-Huegun 61 5  
  F Delbonis 6 2 1 5 P Lorenzi 77 7  
5 P Lorenzi 3 6 6

Bottom Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 F Serra 6 6  
  D Guez 3 2   8 F Serra 79 2 7
  J Martí 66 1   Alt G Naso 67 6 5
Alt G Naso 78 6   8 F Serra 3 1  
  M Viola 6 6     M Viola 6 6  
  E Donskoy 2 3     M Viola 6 3 7
  D Brands 6 77     D Brands 3 6 5
3 D Junqueira 4 63     M Viola 6 2 6
6 É Roger-Vasselin 3 6 6 6 É Roger-Vasselin 3 6 4
  A Balázs 6 2 2 6 É Roger-Vasselin 6 6  
Q B Balleret 2 6 7 Q B Balleret 1 2  
  J-R Lisnard 6 4 5 6 É Roger-Vasselin 6 6  
LL G Granollers 6 64 2 2/WC T de Bakker 4 0  
  K Mesaroš 4 77 6   K Mesaroš 66 3  
  M Fischer 6 3 4 2/WC T de Bakker 78 6  
2/WC T de Bakker 4 6 6
gollark: In that they can frequently do the sort of thing a human could do in one shot without needing to do much conscious thought or use working memory, but fall down horribly on lots of multi-step things or particularly thinky stuff.
gollark: They're not replicating the actual implementation very much. They do seem to be replicating the rough functionality.
gollark: They also do not actually perfectly remember things (or "form new memories" at all after training) unless you glue some kind of external memory retrieval on.
gollark: They might have something like emotions internally (it would be hard to check) but there's not a strong reason for them to be humanlike given their very different tasks.
gollark: Not as capable, obviously, but the same sort of thing.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.