2011 Aegon Trophy – Men's Singles

Ričardas Berankis was the defending champion, but chose not to participate.
Gilles Müller won this tournament, defeating Matthias Bachinger 7–6(4), 6–2 in the final.

Men's Singles
2011 Aegon Trophy
Champion Gilles Müller
Runner-up Matthias Bachinger
Final score7–6(4), 6–2
Main article: 2011 Aegon Trophy

Seeds
  1. Adrian Mannarino (First Round)
  2. Somdev Devvarman (First Round)
  3. Ryan Sweeting (Second Round)
  4. Dmitry Tursunov (Quarterfinals)
  5. Alex Bogomolov, Jr. (Second Round)
  6. Donald Young (First Round)
  7. Matthias Bachinger (Final)
  8. Bobby Reynolds (Second Round)

Main draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
  Tatsuma Ito 64 1  
7 Matthias Bachinger 7 6  
7 Matthias Bachinger 64 2  
  Gilles Müller 7 6  
  Gilles Müller 6 6  
WC Bernard Tomic 3 4  

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 A Mannarino 4 1  
  S Bohli 6 6     S Bohli 6 6  
WC D Cox 4 64     R de Voest 4 2  
  R de Voest 6 7     S Bohli 6 66 3
  I van der Merwe 4 4     T Ito 1 7 6
  T Ito 6 6     T Ito 6 5 6
Q C Niland 6 6   Q C Niland 4 7 4
6 D Young 3 1     T Ito 64 1  
4 D Tursunov 7 6   7 M Bachinger 7 6  
  É Roger-Vasselin 64 4   4 D Tursunov 6 7  
  T Smyczek 7 4 66 Q J Ward 1 5  
Q J Ward 5 6 7 4 D Tursunov 6 4 1
  A Kudryavtsev 6 5 0r 7 M Bachinger 3 6 6
Q A Kuznetsov 3 7 1 Q A Kuznetsov 4 4  
Q Y Sugita 1 3   7 M Bachinger 6 6  
7 M Bachinger 6 6  

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 A Bogomolov, Jr. 66 7 6
  G Soeda 7 5 2 5 A Bogomolov, Jr. 6 3 2
  M Ebden 7 3 7   M Ebden 4 6 6
  L Lacko 63 6 5   M Ebden 7 4 3
  A Beck 7 4 4   G Müller 5 6 6
  G Müller 64 6 6   G Müller 7 6  
WC D Evans 6 0 1 3 R Sweeting 64 4  
3 R Sweeting 1 6 6   G Müller 6 6  
8 B Reynolds 7 1 7 WC B Tomic 3 4  
  K Beck 5 6 5 8 B Reynolds 4 1  
WC B Tomic 6 6   WC B Tomic 6 6  
  C Ball 3 4   WC B Tomic 6 6  
  R Bemelmans 6 6     M Matosevic 1 2  
WC Joshua Milton 4 1     R Bemelmans 4 4  
  M Matosevic 4 6 6   M Matosevic 6 6  
2 S Devvarman 6 3 2
gollark: Just because your language theoretically has words composed of subwords doesn't mean you can ignore the various problems I mentioned (except possibly the grammar one). And "convert the words to semantic expressions" hides a lot of the complexity this would involve.
gollark: I'm pretty sure I've seen diagrams of pronounceable things of some kind, but they're more complex than just permutations of "high tone, low tone" and do not conveniently map to concepts.
gollark: What do you mean "all of the possible forms of a square diagram with two or more sides"? There are infinitely many of those. And how do I just pronounce a diagram without a predetermined mapping?
gollark: Also, I have no idea what an "objective → semantic buffer" is and I think you're underestimating the difficulty of implementing whatever it is.
gollark: I can't actually source this, having checked *at least* two internet things.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.