2010 Weil Tennis Academy Challenger – Singles

Bobby Reynolds won in the final, 3-6, 7-5, 7-5 against Marinko Matosevic.

Singles
2010 Weil Tennis Academy Challenger
Champion Bobby Reynolds
Runner-up Marinko Matosevic
Final score3–6, 7–5, 7–5

Seeds

  1. Ryan Sweeting (Second Round)
  2. Brian Dabul (Semifinals, retired)
  3. Kevin Kim (First Round)
  4. Donald Young (Semifinals)
  5. Michael Yani (withdrew due to elbow injury)
  6. Robert Kendrick (First Round)
  7. Conor Niland (First Round)
  8. Alex Kuznetsov (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
WC Bobby Reynolds 6 6  
4/WC Donald Young 3 2  
WC Bobby Reynolds 3 7 7
  Marinko Matosevic 6 5 5
  Marinko Matosevic 4    
2 Brian Dabul 3 r  

Top Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 R Sweeting 6 6  
  V Estrella 3 1   1 R Sweeting 3 64  
Q Greg Ouellette 1 7 1   P Capdeville 6 7  
  P Capdeville 6 65 6   P Capdeville 6 4 5
WC B Reynolds 6 6   WC B Reynolds 2 6 7
WC S Bangoura 2 1   WC B Reynolds 6 6  
  A Sitak 4 62   8 A Kuznetsov 4 2  
8 A Kuznetsov 6 7   WC B Reynolds 6 6  
4/WC D Young 6 6   4/WC D Young 3 2  
  L Tavares 3 2   4/WC D Young 7 2 7
  M Ryderstedt 4 63   LL D Kelly 5 6 5
LL Dayne Kelly 6 7   4/WC D Young 2 6 6
  M Raonic 6 6     L Gregorc 6 1 4
  T Suzuki 3 3     M Raonic 3 6 1
  L Gregorc 6 6     L Gregorc 6 3 6
7 C Niland 4 4  

Bottom Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 R Kendrick 6 3 62
Q P Bester 2 6 7 Q P Bester 3 1  
Q N Monroe 64 3     T Smyczek 6 6  
  T Smyczek 7 6     T Smyczek 2 2  
ALT P-L Duclos 5 0     M Matosevic 6 6  
  P Polansky 7 6     P Polansky 5 4  
  M Matosevic 6 6     M Matosevic 7 6  
3 K Kim 1 0     M Matosevic 4    
LL M Reid 6 4 2 2 B Dabul 3 r  
  L Cook 4 6 6   L Cook 6 6  
  I van der Merwe 7 66 6   I van der Merwe 4 4  
WC S Johnson 5 7 3   L Cook 3 4  
Q C Mamiit 1 7 62 2 B Dabul 6 6  
  S Groth 6 5 7   S Groth 4 1 r
  J Statham 6 66 65 2 B Dabul 6 1  
2 B Dabul 2 7 7
gollark: It's Greek-derived because of the "a" and "theo" bits.
gollark: Like how you wouldn't call a Christian "agnostic" if they did not have absolute certainty that Christianity (whatever that's defined as) is true.
gollark: It's not really to correct to think something is 100% certainly false, but if you think it's *very very likely* to be false, we generally say you "do not believe" it.
gollark: ↑
gollark: I don't think this is a reasonable distinction. I can't technically disprove the invisible spy unicorns, but I'm not an invisible-spy-unicorn-in-wall agnostic.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.