2010 Weil Tennis Academy Challenger – Doubles
Artem Sitak and Leonardo Tavares won in the final, 4–6, 6–4, [10–8] against Harsh Mankad and Izak van der Merwe.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2010 Weil Tennis Academy Challenger | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 4–6, 6–4, [10–8] |
Seeds
Harsh Mankad / Izak van der Merwe (Final) Lester Cook / David Martin (Semifinals) Samuel Groth / Adam Hubble (Quarterfinals, withdrew) Pierre-Ludovic Duclos / John Paul Fruttero (First Round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Finals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [3] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 64 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 5 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 66 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [8] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [8] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [7] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: <@!356107472269869058> Several months on and off, and what do you mean "how the hell does the server still go along with mods"?
gollark: At the Consortium reactors are actually designed by magic optimization algorithms instead of foolish humans.
gollark: The reactors are designed with negative heat on the fuel they run on, so they don't need to be actively controlled to avoid meltdown.
gollark: There's a Potatonetwork™ controller on the main energy buffer thing, and it broadcasts status to the reactors' individual nodes.
gollark: Although we mostly use fusion.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.