2010 Marburg Open – Singles

Nils Langer was the defending champion, but he chose not to compete this year.
Simone Vagnozzi won the final 2–6, 6–3, 7–5 against Ivo Minář.

Singles
2010 Marburg Open
Champion Simone Vagnozzi
Runner-up Ivo Minář
Final score2–6, 6–3, 7–5
Main article: 2010 Marburg Open

Seeds
  1. Grega Žemlja (Second Round)
  2. Mikhail Kukushkin (Second Round)
  3. Albert Ramos-Viñolas (Second Round)
  4. Christophe Rochus (Second Round)
  5. Victor Crivoi (First Round)
  6. Ivan Sergeyev (Second Round)
  7. Dominik Meffert (withdrew)
  8. Gastón Gaudio (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
Q Grigor Dimitrov 2 64  
  Simone Vagnozzi 6 7  
  Simone Vagnozzi 2 6 7
  Ivo Minář 6 3 5
  Ivo Minář 6 6  
SE Jaroslav Pospíšil 3 0  

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 G Žemlja 6 6  
  B Knittel 4 1   1 G Žemlja 6 3 60
WC S Rieschick 3 2   Q G Dimitrov 3 6 7
Q G Dimitrov 6 6   Q G Dimitrov 6 7  
  P Červenák 6 6     P Červenák 3 63  
LL I Belyaev 4 1     P Červenák 7 6  
  I Cervantes 2 2   8 G Gaudio 63 3  
8 G Gaudio 6 6   Q G Dimitrov 2 64  
3 A Ramos-Viñolas 6 1 6   S Vagnozzi 6 7  
WC M Bachinger 4 6 3 3 A Ramos-Viñolas 7 4 1
  S Vagnozzi 4 6 6   S Vagnozzi 67 6 6
  M Lammer 6 3 1   S Vagnozzi 6 6  
  L Tavares 66 69   LL C Niland 4 2  
  D Gremelmayr 7 7     D Gremelmayr 0 7 4
  G Olaso 4 5   LL C Niland 6 64 6
LL C Niland 6 7  

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 I Sergeyev 6 6  
  K Kravchuk 2 4   6 I Sergeyev 4 3  
Q A Bury 0 5   Q G Rufin 6 6  
Q G Rufin 6 7   Q G Rufin 68 3  
  I Minář 6 7     I Minář 7 6  
WC P Gojowczyk 3 66     I Minář 6 6  
  B Paire 2 7 63 4 C Rochus 2 3  
4 C Rochus 6 5 7   I Minář 6 6  
5 V Crivoi 3 3   SE J Pospíšil 3 0  
SE J Pospíšil 6 6   SE J Pospíšil 5 6 6
  R DeHeart 7 7     R DeHeart 7 3 3
  G Kretschmer 5 5   SE J Pospíšil 6 6  
  D Muñoz-De La Nava 6 7     D Muñoz-De La Nava 3 2  
SE J Janowicz 3 5     D Muñoz-De La Nava 6 4 6
  P Clar-Rosselló 1 4   2 M Kukushkin 3 6 3
2 M Kukushkin 6 6  
gollark: The important thing is probably... quantitative data about the amounts and change of each?
gollark: Regardless of what's actually happening with news, you can probably dredge up a decent amount of examples of people complaining about being too censored *and* the other way round.
gollark: With the butterfly-weather-control example that's derived from, you can't actually track every butterfly and simulate the air movements resulting from this (yet, with current technology and algorithms), but you can just assume some amount of random noise (from that and other sources) which make predictions about the weather unreliable over large time intervals.
gollark: That seems nitpicky, the small stuff is still *mostly* irrelevant because you can lump it together or treat it as noise.
gollark: Why are you invoking the butterfly effect here?

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.