2009 Wimbledon Championships – Gentlemen's Invitation Doubles
Jacco Eltingh and Paul Haarhuis defeated the defending champions Donald Johnson and Jared Palmer in the final, 7–6(7–2), 6–4, to win the Gentlemen's Invitation Doubles tennis title at the 2009 Wimbledon Championships.
Gentlemen's Invitation Doubles | |
---|---|
2009 Wimbledon Championships | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6(7–2), 6–4 |
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Final
Final | ||||||
![]() ![]() | 62 | 4 | ||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 |
Group A
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
![]() ![]() |
6–2, 6–4 | 4–6, 3–6 | 4–6, 6–4, [6–10] | 1–2 | 3–4 | 29–29 | 2 | ||
![]() ![]() |
2–6, 4–6 | 3–6, 2–6 | 7–6(7–4), 6–4 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 24–34 | 4 | ||
![]() ![]() |
6–4, 6–3 | 6–3, 6–2 | 6–1, 6–7(5–7), [11–9] | 3–0 | 6–1 | 37–20 | 1 | ||
![]() ![]() |
6–4, 4–6, [10–6] | 6–7(4–7), 4–6 | 1–6, 7–6(7–5), [9–11] | 1–2 | 3–5 | 29–36 | 3 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
Group B
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
![]() ![]() |
4–6, 7–6(7–1), [10–6] | 6–4, 6–0 | 7–6(10–8), 6–3 | 3–0 | 6–1 | 37–25 | 1 | ||
![]() ![]() |
6–4, 6–7(1–7), [6–10] | 6–3, 6–4 | 6–1, 6–7(8–10), [11–13] | 1–2 | 4–4 | 36–28 | 2 | ||
![]() ![]() |
4–6, 0–6 | 3–6, 4–6 | 7–6(7–4), 6–3 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 24–33 | 3 | ||
![]() ![]() |
6–7(8–10), 3–6 | 1–6, 7–6(10–8), [13–11] | 3–6, 6–7(4–7) | 1–2 | 2–5 | 27–38 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
gollark: Indeed!
gollark: Obviously libraries are necessary as nobody likes interacting with the DOM themselves these days. It is Not Cool.
gollark: That should load in a few tens of ms, unlike gimp.
gollark: Anyway, osmarksßsimageeditor™ *could* in fact be simpler despite being in-browser, as it should be possible to have a decently working thing in maybe 40KB of (compiled) JS (inclusive of libraries).
gollark: Maybe I could make a horrible image generation *DSL*.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.