2009 USA-Brazil Challenge

The 2009 USA-Brazil Challenge was a curling challenge held from January 30 to February 1, 2009 at the Bismarck Capital Curling Club in Bismarck, North Dakota. This was the first Americas Challenge.

2009 Americas Challenge
Host cityBismarck, North Dakota
ArenaBismarck Capital Curling Club
DatesJan. 30 - Feb. 1
Winner United States
SkipTodd Birr
ThirdPaul Pustovar
SecondGreg Wilson
LeadKevin Birr
Finalist Brazil (Marcelo Mello)
2010 »

The challenge featured the Brazilian national men's curling team against an American team in a best-of-five series. The winner would get to represent the second team from the Americas at the 2009 Ford World Men's Curling Championship. Canada automatically qualifies as both hosts and defending champions.

Until 2009, the United States (and Canada) have always automatically qualified on account of no other country in the Americas fielding curling teams. However, in 2008 the Brazilian Ice Sports Federation felt that their men's curling team had a high enough calibre that they were ready to face off with the Americans.

The American team was represented by Todd Birr, whose team was highest on the U.S. Order of Merit as of December 31, 2008 and who qualified for the 2009 United States Olympic Curling Trials.

The Brazilians were represented by their national team, which trained at the Lennoxville Curling Club in Lennoxville, Quebec. They are all students at the Université de Sherbrooke.

Teams

Nation Skip Third Second Lead
 BrazilMarcelo MelloCelso KossakaLuis Augusto SilvaCesar Santos
 United StatesTodd BirrPaul PustovarGreg WilsonKevin Birr

Results

Game 1

Sheet B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
 Brazil (Mello) 0 0 0 1 0 1 X X X X 2
 United States (Birr) 4 2 4 0 3 0 X X X X 13

Game 2

Sheet B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
 United States (Birr) 2 0 1 0 2 3 5 X X X 13
 Brazil (Mello) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 X X X 2

Game 3

Sheet C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
 United States (Birr) 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 X X 11
 Brazil (Mello) 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 X X 5
gollark: Yes, monopolies are bad and should be regulated more.
gollark: I support... somewhat government-regulated mostly-free markets for allocation of resources, and free enterprise/the ability to set up your own company and produce things, roughly.
gollark: I think you're using a weird definition.
gollark: I'm hoping much of the underpaid labour can be replaced with automation in the future, too.
gollark: Not really? If I could somehow make people not want it and skip any of the ethical issues related to that it'd be nice? But they do, and the system satisfies those values.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.