2009 Israel Open – Singles

Marsel İlhan was the defender of championship title, however he lost to Simon Stadler in the quarterfinal.
In the final Benjamin Becker retired when the result was 6–3, 3–1 and Lu Yen-hsun became the new champion.

Singles
2009 Israel Open
Champion Lu Yen-hsun
Runner-up Benjamin Becker
Final score6–3, 3–1, ret.
Main article: 2009 Israel Open

Seeds
  1. Dudi Sela (Quarterfinals)
  2. Lu Yen-hsun (Champion)
  3. Bobby Reynolds (First Round)
  4. Michael Berrer (First Round)
  5. Thiago Alves (First Round)
  6. Benjamin Becker (Final, retired)
  7. Nicolas Mahut (First Round)
  8. Michail Elgin (First Round)

Draw

Key

Final four
Semifinals Final
          
6 Benjamin Becker 7 7  
  Marinko Matosevic 6 5  
6 Benjamin Becker 3 1 r
2 Lu Yen-hsun 6 3  
  Simon Stadler 4 2  
2 Lu Yen-hsun 6 6  

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 D Sela 6 6  
WC N Okun 1 1   1 D Sela 6 7  
  K Pless 3 4     B Klein 3 5  
  B Klein 6 6   1 D Sela 3 6  
  G Bastl 1 7 6 6 B Becker 6 7  
  C Guccione 6 6 3   G Bastl 2 0  
WC A Mashiach 1 1   6 B Becker 6 6  
6 B Becker 6 6   6 B Becker 7 7  
4 M Berrer 4 4     M Matosevic 6 5  
  H Levy 6 6     H Levy      
WC G Dimitrov 6 1     P Amritraj w/o    
  P Amritraj 7 6     H Levy 4 3  
  M Matosevic 7 6     M Matosevic 6 6  
  J Goodall 6 4     M Matosevic 6 6  
  B Evans 6 6     B Evans 4 2  
8 M Elgin 4 3  

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 T Alves 2 7 3
  M İlhan 6 6 6   M İlhan 7 6 6
WC A Hadad 4 4   Q E Kirillov 5 7 1
Q E Kirillov 6 6     M İlhan 5 6 6
  S Stadler 6 6     S Stadler 6 3 7
Q P-L Duclos 3 2     S Stadler 6 6 6
Q S Rieschick 7 7   Q S Rieschick 1 7 4
3 B Reynolds 6 6     S Stadler 4 2  
7 N Mahut 5 3   2 Y-h Lu 6 6  
  B Dorsch 7 6     B Dorsch 6 6 6
  É Roger-Vasselin 2 5     A Kudryavtsev 4 7 0
  A Kudryavtsev 6 7     B Dorsch 2 3  
Q C Eaton 7 6   2 Y-h Lu 6 6  
  R Ram 5 3   Q C Eaton 3 5  
  T Widom 3 2   2 Y-h Lu 6 7  
2 Y-h Lu 6 6  
gollark: I guess it probably does depend a lot, but for quite a lot of user-facing stuff, near-infinite divisibility (infinite with bignums) and no precision issues on small numbers are probably good.
gollark: Much.
gollark: Except speed, but who cares about *that*?
gollark: For most stuff, though, rationals are *probably better*.
gollark: I think the term is associative, right?

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.