2009 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles
Sara Errani and Nuria Llagostera Vives were the defending champions. Both were present that year, but chose to compete with different partners.
Errani partnered with Lourdes Domínguez Lino, but lost in the quarterfinals to Nuria Llagostera Vives and María José Martínez Sánchez.
Llagostera Vives, partnered with Martínez Sánchez, defeated Mariya Koryttseva and Darya Kustova in the final, 6–1, 6–2.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2009 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–1, 6–2 |
Seeds
Anna-Lena Grönefeld / Patty Schnyder (First Round) Nuria Llagostera Vives / María José Martínez Sánchez (Champions) Ekaterina Makarova / Galina Voskoboeva (First Round) İpek Şenoğlu / Yaroslava Shvedova (First Round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [9] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [11] | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [7] | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 64 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [3] | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | r | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: Haskell is obviously no, Python is quite slow and has different ecosystem problems as well as a remarkable amount of weird inconsistency, JS dependencies break after about 5 months and it's an awful language, Rust is somewhat nice but annoying compared to higher level languages, Clojure is maybe good however Lisp and also Java (well, JVM), and... that's about it?
gollark: OCaml suffers from the same sort of ecosystem problem.
gollark: Thus, I am condemned to eternal suffering and minoteaur will never be finished.
gollark: I'm actually investigating F# as a non-bad language, and while it is in fact an excellent language according to the osmarks.tk™ arbitrary language ratings™, the tooling is æææææÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆæææææÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆææÆÆÆÆæææææÆÆÆÆÆæææ (very heavyweight and annoying) and much of the ecosystem is too "enterprisey".
gollark: Troubling. Well, you could try running another thread to do the thing.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.