2009 Australian Open – Wheelchair Men's Doubles
Shingo Kunieda and Satoshi Saida were the defending champions, but only Shingo Kunieda participated this year.
| Wheelchair Men's Doubles | |
|---|---|
| 2009 Australian Open | |
| Champion |   |
| Runner-up |  |
| Final score | 7–5, 6–1 |
Shingo Kunieda partnered Robin Ammerlaan and won in the final 7–5, 6–1, against Stefan Olsson and Maikel Scheffers.
Seeds
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
| Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
| 1 | | ||||||||||||
| w/o | ||||||||||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 2 | | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||
 .svg.png){kind=small} | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 2 | | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
gollark: no.
gollark: But this is not accurate. It assumes the only options are "no god" or "basically Christian god".
gollark: Pascal's Wager basically goes "if no god, belief doesn't have costs anyway (wrong, since it takes time and may make your thinking more irrational); if god, non-belief means infinite badness (hell), belief means infinite goodness (heaven), so rationally you should believe".
gollark: There *may* be a god of some kind who rewards you for believing in them and their afterlife and such, but there is an infinity of possible gods including ones like "allocates you to heaven or hell entirely at random", "entirely indistinguishable from no god", "sends you to hell if you believe in the *other* god", "incomprehensible eldritch abomination" or "literal bees".
gollark: PASACL'S WAGER BAD
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.