2009–10 Hong Kong Second Division League
2009–10 Hong Kong Second Division League is the 96th season of a football league in Hong Kong, Hong Kong Second Division League.
Changes from last season
From Second Division
Promoted to First Division
- Advance Tai Chung
- Shatin
Relegated to Third Division
- Kwok Keung
Quit Hong Kong football league system
- Tung Po
To Second Division
Relegated from First Division
- Mutual
Promoted from Third Division League
- Derico Friends
- Tuen Mun
Name changing
- Rangers renamed as Ongood
- Double Flower renamed as Advance Double Flower
League table
| Pos |
Team |
Pld |
W |
D |
L |
GF |
GA |
GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HKFC (C) (P) | 16 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 53 | 19 | +34 | 37 | Promotion to First Division League |
| 2 | Tuen Mun (P) | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 55 | 17 | +38 | 33 | |
| 3 | Advance Double Flower | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 41 | 19 | +22 | 31 | |
| 4 | Ongood | 16 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 49 | 31 | +18 | 31 | |
| 5 | Wing Yee | 16 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 53 | 38 | +15 | 25 | |
| 6 | Kwai Tsing | 16 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 36 | 23 | +13 | 22 | |
| 7 | Mutual | 16 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 38 | 50 | −12 | 17 | |
| 8 | Fukien (R) | 16 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 43 | 42 | +1 | 13 | Relegation to Third Division League |
| 9 | Derico Friends (R) | 16 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 7 | 136 | −129 | 0 |
Last updated: 24 April 2009.
Source: The Hong Kong Football Association
Top scorers
| Rank | Scorer | Club | Goals[1] |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joe-joe Abah | Ongood / Tuen Mun | 20 |
| 2 | Yau Ping Kai | Wing Yee | 19 |
| 3 | Wu Man Chun | Shatin | 16 |
| 4 | Emmanuel John | Kwai Tsing / Ongood | 13 |
| 5 | Lawrence Akandu | Mutual / Tuen Mun | 13 |
| 6 | Chu Kwok Leung | Tuen Mun | 12 |
| 7 | Tai Siu Wing | Fukien | 11 |
| 8 | Yau Man Lung | Fukien | 10 |
| Jon Angelucci | HKFC | 10 | |
| Chiemela Nnanna | Mutual | 10 |
Only players scored ≥10 is shown.
Notes
- "Second Division League Top scorers". the Hong Kong Football Association. 24 April 2009. Retrieved 24 April 2009.
gollark: Your config can be a programming language too, since it's useful for specifying some things without having to repeat yourself, but it should be separate from the code.
gollark: Application code is stuff which should be the same across deployments. Config is stuff which shouldn't.
gollark: Then your application is wrong.
gollark: * specify, not design
gollark: ```rust let with_db = warp::any().map(move || pool.clone()); let static_files = warp::path("assets").and(warp::fs::dir("assets")); let view_page = warp::path!(String).and(warp::get()).and(with_db.clone()) // repeating the next bit for every route is kind of bad, see if it can be changed somehow .and_then(|title, db| async { error_to_http_response(view_page(db, title).await) }); let editor_page = warp::path!(String / "edit").and(warp::get()).and(with_db.clone()) .and_then(|title, db| async { error_to_http_response(editor_page(db, title).await) }); let save_edit = warp::path!(String / "edit").and(warp::post()).and(warp::body::form()).and(with_db) .and_then(|title, form, db| async { error_to_http_response(save_edit(db, title, form).await) }); let not_found = warp::any().map(|| warp::reply::with_status("404 Not Found", http::StatusCode::NOT_FOUND)); let main = editor_page.or(save_edit).or(view_page); let app = static_files.or(main).or(not_found);```See, this is how you SHOULD design routes: incomprehensibly.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.