2007 World Senior Curling Championships
The 2007 World Senior Curling Championships were held from March 25 to 31 at the Thistle Curling Club in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Scotland won the men's event and Sweden the women's.
| 2007 World Senior Curling Championships | |
|---|---|
| Host city | Edmonton, Canada |
| Arena | Thistle Curling Club |
| Dates | March 25–31 |
| Men's winner |  |
| Skip | Keith Prentice |
| Third | Lockhart Steele |
| Second | Tommy Fleming |
| Lead | Robin Aitken |
| Alternate | Archibald Craig |
| Finalist | .svg.png){kind=small} |
| Women's winner |  |
| Curling club | Stocksunds CK, Stockholm |
| Skip | Ingrid Meldahl |
| Third | Ann-Catrin Kjerr |
| Second | Birgitta Törn |
| Lead | Inger Berg |
| Alternate | Sylvia Kiljefors |
| Coach | Gunilla Bergman |
| Finalist | |
« 2006 2008 » | |
Scotland's Keith Prentice rink won the men's event when Prentice "made a pretty amazing shot" by bumping back a buried Canadian stone on the button to score a point in the eighth and final end in the final.[1]
Men
Round Robin Standings
|
|
.svg.png){kind=small}
Playoffs
| Semi-final | Final | |||||||
|
8 | |||||||
 |
6 | |||||||
|
6 | |||||||
|
5 | |||||||
|
3 | |||||||
|
4 | Bronze medal | ||||||
|
6 | |||||||
|
7 | |||||||
Women
Round Robin Standings
| Country | Skip | W | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Dunn | 10 | 0 |
| Pam Oleinik | 8 | 2 |
| Ingrid Meldahl | 7 | 3 |
| Carolyn Morris | 6 | 4 |
 | Renate Nedkoff | 6 | 4 |
 | Glynnice Lauder | 6 | 4 |
 | Helena Timonen | 4 | 6 |
 | Carola Murek-Rickmers | 4 | 6 |
 | Fiona Turnbull | 2 | 8 |
 | Hideko Tanaka | 1 | 9 |
 | Liz Matthews | 1 | 9 |
Tiebreakers
Playoffs
| Semi-final | Final | |||||||
|
8 | |||||||
|
6 | |||||||
|
5 | |||||||
|
8 | |||||||
|
3 | |||||||
|
7 | Bronze medal | ||||||
|
8 | |||||||
|
12 | |||||||
gollark: Originally Bill Gates, apparently now the meaning of culling and also of words.
gollark: If you accept this then any action which reduces future human population in some way is "culling", which is stupid.
gollark: This is another maybe technically accurate (at an even greater stretch) but ridiculous interpretation. If people don't exist, it is not in fact possible to remove them.
gollark: This sort of thing makes natural languages quite annoying, but you can help by, well, not picking the most emotionally charged word which "technically matches".
gollark: If I say "that person is a criminal" you might very well have a worsened opinion of them, even if I know that all they actually did was jaywalking or something. It's technically not *false* to call them that but misleads.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.