2007 Uzbek League

The 2007 Uzbek League season was the 16th edition of top level football in Uzbekistan since independence from the Soviet Union in 1992.

Uzbek League
Season2007
ChampionsPakhtakor
RelegatedVobkent
Champions LeaguePakhtakor
Kuruvchi
Top goalscorerIlhom Mo'minjonov
21 goals
← 2006
2008 →

Overview

It was contested by 16 teams, and Pakhtakor Tashkent won the championship.

League table
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification or relegation
1 Pakhtakor 30 26 4 0 83 13 +70 82 2008 AFC Champions League Group stage
2 Kuruvchi 30 22 5 3 62 16 +46 71
3 Mash'al Mubarek 30 22 4 4 62 25 +37 70
4 Neftchi Farg'ona 30 19 4 7 53 28 +25 61
5 FK Samarqand-Dinamo 30 14 8 8 48 36 +12 50
6 Nasaf Qarshi 30 13 5 12 43 43 0 44
7 Qizilqum Zarafshon 30 12 3 15 42 64 −22 39
8 Navbahor Namangan 30 11 4 15 37 41 −4 37
9 FK Buxoro 30 11 3 16 29 43 −14 36
10 FK Andijan 30 10 5 15 37 45 −8 35
11 Traktor Tashkent 30 11 1 18 45 58 −13 34
12 Tupolang Sariosiyo 30 8 6 16 29 43 −14 30
13 FC Shurtan Guzar 30 8 5 17 32 51 −19 29
14 Lokomotiv Tashkent 30 6 8 16 25 44 −19 26
15 Metallurg Bekabad (R) 30 6 5 19 32 62 −30 23 Relegation to Lower Division
16 Vobkent FK (R) 30 3 6 21 23 70 −47 15
Updated to match(es) played on 6 December 2007. Source: Uzbekistan Professional Football League
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.

Season statistics

Top goalscorers
Rank Player Club Goals (Pen.)
1 Ilhom Mo'minjonov Lokomotiv / Kuruvchi 21 (1)
2 Farhod Tadjiyev Dinamo 20 (3)
3 Akmal Kholmatov Neftchi 19 (3))
4 Zafar Kholmurodov Nasaf 17 (5)
5 Olim Navkarov Traktor 16 (1)
Alexander Geynrikh Pakhtakor 16 (2)
7 Viktor Klishin Mash'al 14
Rustam Kodirov Mash'al
Karlen Abramov Traktor 14 (1)
10 Vladimir Baranov Navbahor 12
Server Djeparov Pakhtakor 12 (2)
12 Uche Iheruome Pakhtakor 11
13 Anvar Soliev Pakhtakor 10
Timur Islomov Qizilqum

Last updated: 6 December 2007

gollark: Systems have no intentions. People in them might, and the designers probably did, and the designers also likely claimed some intention, and people also probably ascribe some to them. But that doesn't mean that the system itself "wants" to do any of those.
gollark: I think you could reasonably argue that it's better to respect institutions than ignore them because it's better for social cohesion/stability, but I don't agree that you should respect them because they're meant to be fair and because you can always get them to fix problems you experience if this isn't actually true.
gollark: If the fire extinguisher actually explodes when used to put out fires, it would be a bad fire extinguisher even if the designers talk about how good it is and how many fires it can remove.
gollark: We should be evaluating it on how well it does what we want it to, not how well the designers *claim it does*.
gollark: Oh, right.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.