2007 PBZ Zagreb Indoors – Doubles
Jaroslav Levinský and Michal Mertiňák were the defending champions, but did not participate together this year. Levinský partnered František Čermák, finishing runner-up. Mertiňák partnered Petr Pála, losing in the first round.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2007 PBZ Zagreb Indoors | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 7–6(7–5), 4–6, [10–5] |
Michael Kohlmann and Alexander Waske won the title, defeating František Čermák and Jaroslav Levinský 7–6(7–5), 4–6, [10–5] in the final.
Seeds
Jonathan Erlich / Andy Ram (Semifinals) Simon Aspelin / Julian Knowle (Quarterfinals) Yves Allegro / Fabrice Santoro (Quarterfinals) František Čermák / Jaroslav Levinský (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 77 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | 63 | 1 | 65 | 7 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 4 | 77 | 5 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 1 | 67 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 77 | 4 | [10] | 79 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 6 | [8] | 3 | 65 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 3 | 77 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 6 | 77 | 4 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 4 | 6 | [12] | 4 | 65 | 6 | [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | [10] | WC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 5 | 63 | 4 | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 7 | 77 | 4 | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 4 | 64 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 64 | 7 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | [2] | 2 | 77 | 5 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 3 | 6 | [10] |
gollark: It would be very hard to make one preserving all JS's weird quirks.
gollark: I mean, yes, Turing completeness means you *technically* can (except that both OC and CC have finite memory), however you practically can't.
gollark: Except very basic versions.
gollark: JS and HTML5 are highly accursed and complex so you have no chance of implementing them.
gollark: > ok fine, a microwave from the 1800s to be specific.I don't think they had those then. Modern magnetrons are IIRC a 1900s invention.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.