2007–08 Ligat Nashim
The 2007–08 Ligat Nashim was the tenth season of women's league football under the Israeli Football Association.
Season | 2007–08 |
---|---|
Matches played | 132 |
Goals scored | 664 (5.03 per match) |
Top goalscorer | Shirley Ohana (55) |
← 2006–07 2008–09 → |
As all 5 members of the previous season's second division folded, the league was contested as a single division.
The league was won by Maccabi Holon, its fifth consecutive title. By winning, Maccabi Holon qualified to 2008–09 UEFA Women's Cup.
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Maccabi Holon | 22 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 139 | 6 | +133 | 63 | Qualified to UEFA Women's Cup |
2 | ASA Tel Aviv University | 22 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 107 | 8 | +99 | 61 | |
3 | Maccabi Kishronot Hadera | 22 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 67 | 30 | +37 | 50 | |
4 | Hapoel Be'er Sheva | 22 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 70 | 48 | +22 | 38 | |
5 | F.C. Ramat HaSharon | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 54 | 35 | +19 | 29 | |
6 | Maccabi Tzur Shalom Bialik | 22 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 35 | 49 | −14 | 29 | |
7 | Hapoel Ironi Petah Tikva | 22 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 36 | 38 | −2 | 28 | |
8 | Maccabi Be'er Sheva | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 50 | 57 | −7 | 27 | |
9 | Bnot Caesarea Tiv'on | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 38 | 58 | −20 | 22 | |
10 | Bnot Sakhnin | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 33 | 75 | −42 | 22 | |
11 | Hapoel Rishon LeZion | 22 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 28 | 84 | −56 | 12 | |
12 | Hapoel Marmorek | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 7 | 176 | −169 | 0 |
Source:
Top scorers
Rank | Scorer | Club | Goals |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shirley Ohana | Maccabi Holon | 55 |
2 | Adva Twil | ASA Tel Aviv University | 25 |
Adi Yahas | Hapoel Be'er Sheva | ||
4 | Meital Dayan | ASA Tel Aviv University | 22 |
Karin Peretz | Hapoel Be'er Sheva | ||
6 | Dovrat Bendel | ASA Tel Aviv University | 21 |
7 | Or Erez | Maccabi Holon | 20 |
8 | Daniel Sofer | Maccabi Kishronot Hadera | 19 |
9 | Rim Mussa | Maccabi Kishronot Hadera | 16 |
Sheli Israel | ASA Tel Aviv University |
gollark: Bee neuron data.
gollark: New nuclear technology would be safer. It just isn't actually deployed anywhere. The waste isn't a significant issue and I don't think it contributes much to costs.
gollark: Nuclear has been shown to actually work in the past but then got costlier and costlier for ??? reasons.
gollark: Huh, that's more than I thought. But not very much compared to the big centralised ones.
gollark: (At least a lot of it as far as I can tell)
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.