2006 SCSA season
The 2006 SCSA Season was the 6th season of United Kingdom-based NASCAR style stock car racing, originally known as ASCAR.
2006 SCSA | |||
Previous: | 2005 | Next: | 2007 |
Teams and drivers
Team | Car | No. | Driver | Rounds |
---|---|---|---|---|
Revolution Racing | Chevrolet | 7 | All | |
98 | All | |||
Team Ranger Racing | Chevrolet | 9 | 1 | |
Steward Racing | Ford | 15 | 2 | |
1 | ||||
74 | 1 | |||
75 | All | |||
Team Networking | Chevrolet | 31 | 3 | |
59 | 2 | |||
Team Tor Trucks | Pontiac | 48 | 1 | |
5 | ||||
M-Tec | Chevrolet | 66 | 2 | |
Team Catchpole Racing | Chevrolet | 71 | 1 | |
77 | 2 | |||
CWS Racing | Chevrolet | 78 | All | |
79 | 2 | |||
85 | 1 | |||
3 | ||||
Team West-Tec | Pontiac | 88 | All | |
Race calendar
All races were held at the Rockingham Motor Speedway in Corby, Northamptonshire.
The season consisted of six meetings of two races each. The grid for the opening race of each meeting was set by a qualifying session with the second race grid being set by the finishing order of the first.
Round | Date | Pole Position | Fastest Lap | Led Most Laps | Winning Driver | Winning Team | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | R1 | 7 May | |||||
R2 | |||||||
2 | R3 | 25 June | |||||
R4 | |||||||
3 | R5 | 9 July | |||||
R6 | |||||||
4 | R7 | 13 August | |||||
R8 | Cancelled due to rain | ||||||
5 | R9 | 10 September | |||||
R10 | 11 September | ||||||
6 | R11 | 8 October | |||||
R12 | |||||||
Final points standings
Pos | Driver | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | R9 | R10 | R11 | R12 | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2* | 1* | 1* | 1* | 1* | 1* | 1* | C | 1* | 1* | 10 | DNS | 1985 | |
2 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | C | 11 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 1910 | |
3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2* | 3 | C | 13 | 10 | 1* | 1* | 1905 | |
4 | 7* | DNS | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | C | 9 | 3 | 2* | 4 | 1885 | |
5 | 8 | DNS | 8 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | C | 4 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 1835 | |
6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | C | 5 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 1690 | |||
7 | 4 | 4 | 6 | C | 6 | 5 | 1080 | |||||||
8 | 10 | C | 10 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 865 | |||||||
9 | 7 | 4 | 9 | C | 12 | 9 | 850 | |||||||
10 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 720 | |||||||||
11 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 525 | |||||||||
12 | 1* | 3 | 9 | DNS | 400 | |||||||||
13 | 5 | 5 | 360 | |||||||||||
14 | 7 | C | 350 | |||||||||||
15 | 7 | 7 | 340 | |||||||||||
16 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 13 | 240 | |||||||||
17 | 2 | 11 | 205 | |||||||||||
18 | 6 | 7 | 185 | |||||||||||
gollark: Floats aren't unique to JS, but the apiological thing is that it has ONLY floats. Even Lua fixed that.
gollark: OR ARE THEY?
gollark: Yes, it's popular.
gollark: Node's method of async with tons of callbacks was awful. Promises are okay, but async requiring sprinkling of magic syntax bits everywhere is beelike.
gollark: Just because JS happened to be picked for clients. though. And now with WASM tons of stuff can do that.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.