2006 InterLiga
America was originally set to participate in the 2006 InterLiga tournament, but their 2005 clausura championship qualified the team for the 2006 CONCACAF Champions' Cup. Therefore, the club was replaced by Cruz Azul. The teams Tigres and Chivas de Guadalajara qualified to Copa Libertadores 2006
InterLiga | |
---|---|
Tournament details | |
Host country | USA |
Dates | 5 January 2006 - 15 January 2006 |
Teams | 8 (from the FMF confederations) |
Venue(s) | 4 (in 4 host cities) |
Final positions | |
Champions | UANL (2nd title) |
Runners-up | Guadalajara |
Tournament statistics | |
Matches played | 14 |
Groups
Group A
Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veracruz | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 6 |
Monterrey | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 5 |
Pachuca | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
Monarcas Morelia | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | −2 | 1 |
Source:
Group B
Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tigres | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 6 |
Guadalajara | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 5 |
Necaxa | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Cruz Azul | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | −5 | 1 |
Source:
Match schedule
Matches at Reliant Stadium (Houston, Texas)
1. | 4 Jan 06 | Cruz Azul vs Necaxa | 0-1 |
2. | 4 Jan 06 | UANL vs Guadalajara | 3-5 |
Matches at La Joya Stadium (La Joya, Texas)
3. | 5 Jan 06 | Pachuca vs Veracruz | 2-3 |
4. | 5 Jan 06 | Monterrey vs Morelia | 2-2 |
Matches at Pizza Hut Park (Frisco, Texas)
5. | 7 Jan 06 | Necaxa vs UANL | 2-3 |
6. | 7 Jan 06 | Guadalajara vs Cruz Azul | 2-2 |
7. | 8 Jan 06 | Morelia vs Pachuca | 1-2 |
8. | 8 Jan 06 | Veracruz vs Monterrey | 1-2 |
Matches at The Home Depot Center (Carson, California)
9. | 10 Jan 06 | Tigres vs Cruz Azul | 4-0 |
10. | 10 Jan 06 | Necaxa vs Guadalajara | 1-1 |
11. | 11 Jan 06 | Morelia vs Veracruz | 0-1 |
12. | 11 Jan 06 | Monterrey vs Pachuca | 1-1 |
13. | 15 Jan 06 | Final 1: UANL vs Monterrey | 2-1 aet |
14. | 15 Jan 06 | Final 2: Veracruz vs Guadalajara | 1-2 |
gollark: They're not THAT internally inconsistent I think. Presumably they have empathy or something and don't want other people to be mind controlled by the government or whatever (or somehow think they can convince other people to support their thing).
gollark: It seems to suggest that the mRNA vaccines offer better protection than actually being infected.
gollark: There seems to be actual data on reinfection rates now: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/past-covid-19-infection-provides-some-immunity-but-people-may-still-carry-and-transmit-virus
gollark: Especially since it would forbid people from taking earlier action.
gollark: It seems like a stupid law, in general.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.