2006 China Open – Women's Doubles
Nuria Llagostera Vives and María Vento-Kabchi were the defending champions, but Llagostera Vives did not compete this year. Vento-Kabchi teamed up with Lourdes Domínguez Lino and lost in first round to Séverine Brémond and Amélie Mauresmo.
Women's Doubles | |
---|---|
2006 China Open | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 6–2, 6–4 |
Virginia Ruano Pascual and Paola Suárez won the title by defeating Anna Chakvetadze and Elena Vesnina 6–2, 6–4 in the final.
Seeds
Yan Zi / Zheng Jie (First round) Virginia Ruano Pascual / Paola Suárez (Champions) Eleni Daniilidou / Anabel Medina Garrigues (First round) Marion Bartoli / Gisela Dulko (Semifinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 2 | 6 | 66 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 78 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 0 | Q | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
PR | 6 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 2 | PR | 6 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 3 | WC | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC/PR | 64 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 77 | 7 |
gollark: Capitalism is why we have a massively effective (okay, mostly, some things are bad and need fixing, like intellectual property) economic engine here which can produce tons of stuff people want. But people *do not care* about diverting that to help faraway people they can't see.
gollark: Helping people elsewhere does mean somewhat fewer resources available here, and broadly speaking people do not actually want to make that tradeoff.
gollark: You don't particularly need that. You can just buy a cheaper phone and give charity £400 or something.
gollark: People might actually look at you as weird if you donate a significant % of your income to effective charities, rather than just £10 a month to WarmFuzzyCharity2000 which helps endangered homeless tigers get food or something.
gollark: As far as I'm aware, you can actually still save lives for something like £500 each by donating money to help with malaria in Africa. But *nobody does this*!
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.