2006 American Indoor Football League season
The 2006 American Indoor Football League was the league's 2nd overall season. The league champions were the Canton Legends, who defeated the Rome Renegades in American Bowl II.
2006 American Indoor Football Association season | |
---|---|
League | American Indoor Football Association |
Sport | Indoor football |
America Bowl II | |
Champions | Canton Legends |
Runners-up | Rome Renegades |
Standings
Team | Overall | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wins | Losses | Percentage | ||||
Northern Conference | ||||||
Reading Express | 12 | 2 | 0.857 | |||
Canton Legends | 10 | 4 | 0.714 | |||
Erie Freeze | 10 | 4 | 0.857 | |||
Huntington Heroes | 9 | 5 | 0.642 | |||
Johnstown Riverhawks | 8 | 6 | 0.571 | |||
Miami Valley Silverbacks | 5 | 9 | 0.357 | |||
Steubenville Stampede | 2 | 14 | 0.142 | |||
Syracuse Soldiers | 1 | 10 | 0.090 | |||
*Columbus Blackhawks | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | |||
*Philadelphia Scorpions | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | |||
*Cumberland Valley Cardinals | 0 | 2 | 0.000 | |||
Southern Conference | ||||||
Rome Renegades | 12 | 2 | 0.857 | |||
Richmond Bandits | 12 | 2 | 0.857 | |||
Raleigh Rebels | 8 | 6 | 0.571 | |||
Chattahoochee Valley Vipers | 8 | 6 | 0.571 | |||
Daytona Beach Thunder | 6 | 8 | 0.428 | |||
Augusta Spartans | 6 | 8 | 0.571 | |||
Florence Phantoms | 4 | 10 | 0.285 | |||
**AIFL Ghostchasers | 0 | 5 | 0.000 | |||
Carolina Ghostriders | 0 | 11 | 0.000 | |||
- Green indicates clinched playoff berth
- Purple indicates division champion
- Grey indicates best league record
- During regular season, all teams played within their conference.
- * = Filled in for games, due to Syracuse folding during the season. All three of these teams were outdoor amateur teams in the North American Football League.
- ** = Played remainder of Ghostriders road games, due to team folding during season.
Playoffs
Conference Semifinals | Conference Championships | American Bowl II | ||||||||||||
3 | Erie | 45 | ||||||||||||
2 | Canton | 54 | ||||||||||||
2 | Canton | 44 | ||||||||||||
1 | Reading | 24 | ||||||||||||
4 | Huntington | 23 | ||||||||||||
1 | Reading | 57 | ||||||||||||
N2 | Canton | 61 | ||||||||||||
S1 | Rome | 40 | ||||||||||||
3 | Raleigh* | 2 | ||||||||||||
2 | Richmond | 0 | ||||||||||||
3 | Raleigh | 14 | ||||||||||||
1 | Rome | 63 | ||||||||||||
4 | Chattahoochee Valley | 39 | ||||||||||||
1 | Rome | 64 | ||||||||||||
*=Forfeit win
gollark: I don't think this affects *me* very badly, since my configured disk encryption all runs in software without any weird TPM interaction, I don't use "secure" boot, and it seems like this would need physical access or unrealistically good timing, but it's still not very good.
gollark: I wonder if AMD's PSP has similar holes. In any case, they should really just not be sticking subprocessors with closed-source non-user-modifiable firmware and root access into every CPU.
gollark: I don't think there's a reason they couldn't other than bad performance. Which might require you to turn down quality, increase bitrate, decrease resolution/framerate or whatever else.
gollark: I think the LattePanda ones are just x86.
gollark: You need the URL-encoded-body parsing middleware, basically.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.