2005 Wimbledon Championships – Women's Doubles Qualifying
Players and pairs who neither have high enough rankings nor receive wild cards may participate in a qualifying tournament held one week before the annual Wimbledon Tennis Championships.
Women's Doubles Qualifying | |
---|---|
2005 Wimbledon Championships |
Seeds
Maureen Drake / Carly Gullickson (First round) Alona Bondarenko / Anastasia Rodionova (Qualified) Klaudia Jans / Alicja Rosolska (First round) Līga Dekmeijere / Jasmin Wöhr (First round) Mervana Jugić-Salkić / Martina Müller (First round) Yuliana Fedak / Lilia Osterloh (Qualifying Competition, Lucky losers) Teryn Ashley / Lindsay Lee-Waters (First round) Caroline Dhenin / Stéphanie Foretz (First round)
Qualifiers
Lucky losers
Qualifying draw
First qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 9 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||
8 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 2 | ||||||||||
Second qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 77 | 11 | ||||||||||
7 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 64 | 9 | |||||||||
Third qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||
5 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 62 | ||||||||||
Fourth qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
6 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 0 | ||||||||||
6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
gollark: I expect that even if I said "HINT: try looking up "factorize number"" people would complain.
gollark: They don't need to know what potatOS is, only what a semiprime is, and it would be easy enough to just look it up.
gollark: It would be a utopia!
gollark: And then even when it was explained "you can just look up a thing to solve this, it is easy" people just go "AAAA MAFS TOO HARD" still.
gollark: But instead people just decide that anything complicated-looking is obviously impossible?
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.