2005 Bausch & Lomb Championships – Doubles

Nadia Petrova and Meghann Shaughnessy were the defending champions, but were forced to withdraw as Shaughnessy suffered a lower back injury during her singles match against Peng Shuai.

Doubles
2005 Bausch & Lomb Championships
Champions Bryanne Stewart
Samantha Stosur
Runners-up Květa Peschke
Patty Schnyder
Final score6–4, 6–2
Draw16 (1Q / 2WC)
Seeds4
Main article: 2005 Bausch & Lomb Championships

Bryanne Stewart and Samantha Stosur won the title by defeating Květa Peschke and Patty Schnyder 6–4, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds
  1. Nadia Petrova / Meghann Shaughnessy (Withdrew due to a lower back injury on Shaughnessy)
  2. Lisa Raymond / Rennae Stubbs (Quarterfinals)
  3. Elena Likhovtseva / Ai Sugiyama (First round)
  4. Conchita Martínez / Virginia Ruano Pascual (First round)
  5. Alicia Molik / Martina Navratilova (Semifinals)

Draw

Key

Draw
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
5 A Molik
M Navratilova 		6 3 6
Q L Domínguez Lino
E Linetskaya 		4 6 0 5 A Molik
M Navratilova 		3 7 6
WC E Daniilidou
C Gullickson 		2 77 6 WC E Daniilidou
C Gullickson 		6 5 2
A Myskina
V Zvonareva 		6 62 4 5 A Molik
M Navratilova 		3 6 5
3 E Likhovtseva
A Sugiyama 		65 66 K Peschke
P Schnyder 		6 3 7
K Peschke
P Schnyder 		77 78 K Peschke
P Schnyder 		6 6
L Huber
M Washington 		6 5 4 LL J Lee
S Peng 		3 4
LL J Lee
S Peng 		3 7 6 K Peschke
P Schnyder 		4 2
A-L Grönefeld
A Medina Garrigues 		6 6 B Stewart
S Stosur 		6 6
LL J Craybas
J Russell 		4 4 A-L Grönefeld
A Medina Garrigues 		1 3
S Asagoe
K Srebotnik 		6 6 S Asagoe
K Srebotnik 		6 6
4 C Martínez
V Ruano Pascual 		2 3 S Asagoe
K Srebotnik 		2 64
L McShea
M Vento-Kabchi 		3 63 B Stewart
S Stosur 		6 77
B Stewart
S Stosur 		6 77 B Stewart
S Stosur 		2 78 77
WC C Morariu
M Pierce 		2 4 2 L Raymond
R Stubbs 		6 66 62
2 L Raymond
R Stubbs 		6 6
gollark: I mean, you can multiply pi by 2, but I mean digit-based arbitrary-precision ones.
gollark: Anyone know a formula for (digits of) Tau?
gollark: ???
gollark: I prefer GC'd languages, partly because there are more nice functional ones with cool syntax which have GCs and partly because the borrow checker annoys me lots.
gollark: It's more compile-time smart pointers than actual smart pointers, I think.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.