2005 Asian Youth Boys Volleyball Championship

The 2005 Asian Youth Boys Volleyball Championship was held in Azadi Volleyball Hall, Tehran, Iran from 13 to 19 May 2005.

2005 Asian Youth Boys Championship
Tournament details
Host nation Iran
Dates13–19 May
Teams8
Venue(s)1 (in 1 host city)
Champions Iran (2nd title)
Tournament awards
MVP Saber Narimannejad

Pools composition

The teams are seeded based on their final ranking at the 2003 Asian Youth Boys Volleyball Championship.

Pool A Pool B

 Iran (Host & 2nd)
 Thailand (5th)
 Japan
 Chinese Taipei

 India (1st)
 China (4th)
 South Korea
 Australia

Preliminary round

Pool A
Pts Matches Sets Points
Rank Team W L W L Ratio W L Ratio
1  Iran 6 3 0 9 1 9.000 248 206 1.204
2  Chinese Taipei 5 2 1 6 4 1.500 238 225 1.058
3  Japan 4 1 2 4 6 0.667 222 227 0.978
4  Thailand 3 0 3 1 9 0.111 198 248 0.798
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
13 May Chinese Taipei  3–0  Thailand 25–20 25–20 25–18     75–58
13 May Iran  3–0  Japan 25–16 25–17 25–22     75–55
14 May Japan  1–3  Chinese Taipei 20–25 25–22 21–25 26–28   92–100
14 May Thailand  1–3  Iran 25–23 19–25 23–25 21–25   88–98
15 May Japan  3–0  Thailand 25–13 25–19 25–20     75–52
15 May Chinese Taipei  0–3  Iran 20–25 20–25 18–25     63–75

Pool B
Pts Matches Sets Points
Rank Team W L W L Ratio W L Ratio
1  South Korea 6 3 0 9 2 4.500 268 233 1.150
2  India 5 2 1 7 6 1.167 297 281 1.057
3  China 4 1 2 6 8 0.750 287 305 0.941
4  Australia 3 0 3 3 9 0.333 247 280 0.882
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
13 May China  3–2  Australia 25–22 21–25 21–25 25–23 15–8 107–103
13 May India  1–3  South Korea 25–23 23–25 21–25 23–25   92–98
14 May South Korea  3–1  China 25–22 25–17 20–25 25–18   95–82
14 May Australia  1–3  India 22–25 25–23 17–25 21–25   85–98
15 May South Korea  3–0  Australia 25–21 25–17 25–21     75–59
15 May China  2–3  India 17–25 25–20 21–25 25–22 10–15 98–107

Final round
 
QuarterfinalsSemifinalsFinal
 
          
 
17 May – Tehran
 
 
 Iran3
 
18 May – Tehran
 
 Australia1
 
 Iran3
 
17 May – Tehran
 
 India0
 
 India3
 
19 May – Tehran
 
 Japan2
 
 Iran3
 
17 May – Tehran
 
 South Korea0
 
 South Korea3
 
18 May – Tehran
 
 Thailand2
 
 South Korea3
 
17 May – Tehran
 
 Chinese Taipei1 3rd place
 
 Chinese Taipei3
 
19 May – Tehran
 
 China2
 
 India3
 
 
 Chinese Taipei0
 
 
5th–8th places5th place
 
      
 
18 May – Tehran
 
 
 Australia0
 
19 May – Tehran
 
 Japan3
 
 Japan3
 
18 May – Tehran
 
 China1
 
 Thailand0
 
 
 China3
 
7th place
 
 
19 May – Tehran
 
 
 Australia0
 
 
 Thailand3

Quarterfinals
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
17 May India  3–2  Japan 20–25 27–29 25–20 25–23 15–11 112–108
17 May South Korea  3–2  Thailand 19–25 25–14 25–20 24–26 15–11 108–96
17 May Iran  3–1  Australia 26–24 23–25 25–14 25–18   99–81
17 May Chinese Taipei  3–2  China 28–30 27–29 25–23 25–20 15–12 120–114

5th–8th semifinals
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
18 May Thailand  0–3  China 19–25 16–25 22–25     57–75
18 May Australia  0–3  Japan 23–25 15–25 15–25     53–75

Semifinals
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
18 May Iran  3–0  India 25–19 25–15 25–22     75–56
18 May South Korea  3–1  Chinese Taipei 23–25 25–21 25–23 25–16   98–85

7th place
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
19 May Australia  0–3  Thailand 23–25 22–25 23–25     68–75

5th place
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
19 May Japan  3–1  China 22–25 25–15 28–26 25–15   100–81

3rd place
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
19 May India  3–0  Chinese Taipei 25–21 25–22 25–22     75–65

Final
Date Score Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Total
19 May Iran  3–0  South Korea 25–20 25–16 25–12     75–48

Final standing

Awards
gollark: That's nice.
gollark: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fpuzzlewocky.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F04%2Fnewcombsparadox.jpg%3Fresize%3D639%252C229%26ssl%3D1&f=1&nofb=1
gollark: Here's a "helpful" illustration.
gollark: Consider the scenario: there are two boxes before you. One of the boxes (let us call it "A") is transparent and contains £10000, which you can see. The other box ("B") is opaque. It contains £1000000 if and only if the entity running this weird scenario predicted (beforehand) that you'll take box B and not box A. Historically, it has been right the vast majority of the time about this. Your options are to take both boxes, or just to take B. What do?!
gollark: Anyway, while I exist, Newcomb's paradox is a fun if not particularly related problem in decision theory.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.