2004 Proximus Diamond Games – Singles
Venus Williams was the defending champion, but did not compete this year.
Singles | |
---|---|
2004 Proximus Diamond Games | |
Champion | |
Runner-up | |
Final score | 6–3, 6–0 |
Kim Clijsters won the title by defeating Silvia Farina Elia 6–3, 6–0 in the final.
Seeds
The first five seeds received a bye into the second round.
Justine Henin-Hardenne (Withdrew) Kim Clijsters (Champion) Venus Williams (Withdrew) Elena Dementieva (Withdrew) Patty Schnyder (Quarterfinals) Francesca Schiavone (Withdrew) Anna Smashnova-Pistolesi (First round) Silvia Farina Elia (Final) Magdalena Maleeva (Quarterfinals) Magüi Serna (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
8 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||
8 | 3 | 0 | |||||||||||
2 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
LL | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||
2 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
Top Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LL | 77 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 62 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 65 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 3 | 1 | LL | 77 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
LL | 6 | 6 | 5 | 66 | 0r | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 77 | 8 | 78 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 63 | WC | 6 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 6 | 6 |
Bottom Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 6 | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 4 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | 6 | LL | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 77 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
LL | 6 | 64 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LL | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 7 | 6 | Q | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 4 | 9 | 62 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
LL | 6 | 6 | 2 | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 3 | 2 | LL | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
gollark: So companies are supposed to just give goods to their "friends"...?
gollark: To some extent, but it's fuzzier, and how is that meant to work for *factories* or whatever?
gollark: And it's (very roughly) gotten by providing stuff people want, so organizations which can do that can pay more than ones which can't.
gollark: And "who can pay most" is simple and objective.
gollark: For example, you're incentivised to not spent unreasonable amounts of it, because you have finite amounts of it and it's hard to get.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.