2004 Proximus Diamond Games – Singles

Venus Williams was the defending champion, but did not compete this year.

Singles
2004 Proximus Diamond Games
Champion Kim Clijsters
Runner-up Silvia Farina Elia
Final score6–3, 6–0

Kim Clijsters won the title by defeating Silvia Farina Elia 6–3, 6–0 in the final.

Seeds

The first five seeds received a bye into the second round.

  1. Justine Henin-Hardenne (Withdrew)
  2. Kim Clijsters (Champion)
  3. Venus Williams (Withdrew)
  4. Elena Dementieva (Withdrew)
  5. Patty Schnyder (Quarterfinals)
  6. Francesca Schiavone (Withdrew)
  7. Anna Smashnova-Pistolesi (First round)
  8. Silvia Farina Elia (Final)
  9. Magdalena Maleeva (Quarterfinals)
  10. Magüi Serna (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
Karolina Šprem 4 5
8 Silvia Farina Elia 6 7
8 Silvia Farina Elia 3 0
2 Kim Clijsters 6 6
LL Myriam Casanova 1 2
2 Kim Clijsters 6 6

Top Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
LL S Foretz 77 4 4
D Chládková 6 6 D Chládková 62 6 6
E Gagliardi 0 0 D Chládková 4 3
C Black 6 4 6 K Šprem 6 6
Q Z Ondrášková 4 6 3 C Black 4 3
K Šprem 6 7 K Šprem 6 6
7 A Smashnova-Pistolesi 1 5 K Šprem 4 5
8 S Farina Elia 6 7
5 P Schnyder 65 6 7
Q A Stevenson 3 1 LL J Vakulenko 77 4 5
LL J Vakulenko 6 6 5 P Schnyder 66 0r
WC E Callens 6 77 8 S Farina Elia 78 1
É Loit 1 63 WC E Callens 6 2 1
M Sánchez Lorenzo 3 0 8 S Farina Elia 3 6 6
8 S Farina Elia 6 6

Bottom Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
10 M Serna 4 2
Q K Koukalová 6 6 K Koukalová 6 77
D Safina 6 6 D Safina 4 62
A Barna 4 4 K Koukalová 6 3 4
T Pisnik 6 3 6 LL M Casanova 4 6 6
P Mandula 1 6 2 T Pisnik 1 77 4
LL M Casanova 6 64 6
LL M Casanova 1 2
9 M Maleeva 6 6 2 K Clijsters 6 6
M Pierce 4 4 9 M Maleeva 6 6
Q I Benešová 7 6 Q I Benešová 4 4
E Daniilidou 5 4 9 M Maleeva 62 2
LL A Parra Santonja 6 6 2 K Clijsters 77 6
WC E Clijsters 3 2 LL A Parra Santonja 3 2
2 K Clijsters 6 6
gollark: So companies are supposed to just give goods to their "friends"...?
gollark: To some extent, but it's fuzzier, and how is that meant to work for *factories* or whatever?
gollark: And it's (very roughly) gotten by providing stuff people want, so organizations which can do that can pay more than ones which can't.
gollark: And "who can pay most" is simple and objective.
gollark: For example, you're incentivised to not spent unreasonable amounts of it, because you have finite amounts of it and it's hard to get.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.