2004 Proximus Diamond Games – Singles

Venus Williams was the defending champion, but did not compete this year.

Singles
2004 Proximus Diamond Games
Champion Kim Clijsters
Runner-up Silvia Farina Elia
Final score6–3, 6–0
Main article: 2004 Proximus Diamond Games

Kim Clijsters won the title by defeating Silvia Farina Elia 6–3, 6–0 in the final.

Seeds

The first five seeds received a bye into the second round.

  1. Justine Henin-Hardenne (Withdrew)
  2. Kim Clijsters (Champion)
  3. Venus Williams (Withdrew)
  4. Elena Dementieva (Withdrew)
  5. Patty Schnyder (Quarterfinals)
  6. Francesca Schiavone (Withdrew)
  7. Anna Smashnova-Pistolesi (First round)
  8. Silvia Farina Elia (Final)
  9. Magdalena Maleeva (Quarterfinals)
  10. Magüi Serna (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
Karolina Šprem 4 5
8 Silvia Farina Elia 6 7
8 Silvia Farina Elia 3 0
2 Kim Clijsters 6 6
LL Myriam Casanova 1 2
2 Kim Clijsters 6 6

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
LL S Foretz 77 4 4
D Chládková 6 6 D Chládková 62 6 6
E Gagliardi 0 0 D Chládková 4 3
C Black 6 4 6 K Šprem 6 6
Q Z Ondrášková 4 6 3 C Black 4 3
K Šprem 6 7 K Šprem 6 6
7 A Smashnova-Pistolesi 1 5 K Šprem 4 5
8 S Farina Elia 6 7
5 P Schnyder 65 6 7
Q A Stevenson 3 1 LL J Vakulenko 77 4 5
LL J Vakulenko 6 6 5 P Schnyder 66 0r
WC E Callens 6 77 8 S Farina Elia 78 1
É Loit 1 63 WC E Callens 6 2 1
M Sánchez Lorenzo 3 0 8 S Farina Elia 3 6 6
8 S Farina Elia 6 6

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
10 M Serna 4 2
Q K Koukalová 6 6 K Koukalová 6 77
D Safina 6 6 D Safina 4 62
A Barna 4 4 K Koukalová 6 3 4
T Pisnik 6 3 6 LL M Casanova 4 6 6
P Mandula 1 6 2 T Pisnik 1 77 4
LL M Casanova 6 64 6
LL M Casanova 1 2
9 M Maleeva 6 6 2 K Clijsters 6 6
M Pierce 4 4 9 M Maleeva 6 6
Q I Benešová 7 6 Q I Benešová 4 4
E Daniilidou 5 4 9 M Maleeva 62 2
LL A Parra Santonja 6 6 2 K Clijsters 77 6
WC E Clijsters 3 2 LL A Parra Santonja 3 2
2 K Clijsters 6 6
gollark: You probably want to revert that when the program *exits*.
gollark: > Which is exactly what they wanted here!Not necessarily, this actually does sound like a case where they might want each task to run in its own coroutines (or would, if their pathfinding did yields).
gollark: I mean, it's great for very simple situations where you want to run two things at once in the simplest case, but often projects want to run a listener "thread" and temporarily spawn tasks to handle them or something and this ends up being constantly reinvented.
gollark: > Thanks for that gollark :/.You're welcome! It would be useful if there was an API for this! Perhaps I could simplify some of my stuff and make a PR!
gollark: Parallel isn't great because you can't add an extra task after it starts.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.