2004 Davis Cup Asia/Oceania Zone
The Asia/Oceania Zone was one of three zones of regional competition in the 2004 Davis Cup.
Group I
Second Round Play-offs 24–26 September |
First Round Play-offs 9–11 April |
First Round 6–8 February |
Second Round 9–11 April | |||||||||||||||||
Nonthaburi, Thailand (indoor hard) | ||||||||||||||||||||
S | |
5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Kaohsiung, Taiwan (hard) | |
0 | Bangkok, Thailand (indoor hard) | |||||||||||||||||
|
0 | S | |
4 | ||||||||||||||||
|
5 | Kaohsiung, Taiwan (hard) | S | |
1 | |||||||||||||||
S | |
4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Islamabad, Pakistan (clay) | |
1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
3 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2 | Jakarta, Indonesia (hard) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Jakarta, Indonesia (hard) | S | |
3 | Osaka, Japan (hard) | ||||||||||||||||
|
5 | S | |
3 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0 | Invercargill, New Zealand (indoor carpet) | S | |
2 | |||||||||||||||
|
2 | |||||||||||||||||||
S | |
3 | ||||||||||||||||||
New Zealand relegated to Group II in 2005. |
Thailand and Japan advance to World Group Play-off. |
Group II
Play-offs 9–11 April |
First Round 6–8 February |
Second Round 9–11 April |
Third Round 24–26 September | |||||||||||||||||
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (indoor hard) | ||||||||||||||||||||
S | |
5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tehran, Iran (clay) | |
0 | Busan, South Korea (hard) | |||||||||||||||||
|
1 | S | |
5 | ||||||||||||||||
|
4 | Beirut, Lebanon (indoor carpet) | S | |
0 | |||||||||||||||
S | |
3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2 | Nanjing, China (hard) | ||||||||||||||||||
S | |
2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Manila, Philippines (indoor clay) | S | |
3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Manila, Philippines (indoor clay) | S | |
4 | Nanjing, China (indoor hard) | ||||||||||||||||
|
4 | S | |
5 | ||||||||||||||||
S | |
1 | Causeway Bay, Hong Kong (hard) | |
0 | |||||||||||||||
S | |
1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Malaysia and Hong Kong relegated to Group III in 2005. |
China promoted to Group I in 2005. |
Group III
Venue: Phu Tho Tennis Centre, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (hard)
Date: 5–11 April
Group A | KAZ | TJK | QAT | OMA | |
1 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 0-3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 3-0 | ||
4 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
Group B | POC | VIE | BRN | SYR | |
1 | [[File:|23x15px|border |alt=|link=]] Pacific Oceania (3-0) | 2-1 | 3-0 | 3-0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 3-0 | ||
3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | ||
4 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 1-2 |
(scores in italics carried over from Groups)
1st-4th Play-off | KAZ | POC | VIE | TJK | |
1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | [[File:|23x15px|border |alt=|link=]] Pacific Oceania (2-1) | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | |
3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 2-0 | ||
4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0-2 |
5th-8th Play-off | BRN | QAT | OMA | SYR | |
1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | ||
4 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 1-2 |
- Kazakhstan and Pacific Oceania promoted to Group II in 2005.
- Oman and Syria relegated to Group IV in 2005.
Group IV
Venue: Al Hussein Sport City, Amman, Jordan (hard)
Date: 5–11 April
Pool A | KSA | SIN | JOR | UAE | BRU | TKM | |
1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | ||
4 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | ||
5 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | ||
6 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
Pool B | SRI | BAN | MYA | KGZ | IRQ | |
1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 3-0 | ||
3 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | ||
4 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | ||
5 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 1-2 |
- Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka promoted to Group III in 2005.
gollark: It matters to current-me, so I don't want to do that.
gollark: It would be fun to the *edited* me.
gollark: "Fun" is probably just some weird heuristic for novelty-seeking, but it manifests more as a terminal goal than some bad mental tool for navigating goals.
gollark: (or properly for situations it wasn't really optimized for)
gollark: It's an effective one, since you don't have to rely on a glitchy evolved heuristic which might not work properly.
See also
- Davis Cup structure
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.