2004 Challenge Bell – Singles

Maria Sharapova was the defending champion, but decided not to participate this year.

Singles
2004 Challenge Bell
Champion Martina Suchá
Runner-up Abigail Spears
Final score7–5, 3–6, 6–2
Main article: 2004 Challenge Bell

Martina Suchá won the title, defeating Abigail Spears 7–5, 3–6, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds
  1. Mary Pierce (Quarterfinals)
  2. Daniela Hantuchová (Second round)
  3. Mashona Washington (First round)
  4. Jill Craybas (Second round)
  5. Tamarine Tanasugarn (Second round)
  6. Claudine Schaul (Second round)
  7. Laura Granville (Second round)
  8. Samantha Stosur (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
  Alina Jidkova 64 6 64
Q Abigail Spears 77 4 77
Q Abigail Spears 5 6 2
  Martina Suchá 7 3 6
  Martina Suchá 77 5 78
  María Emilia Salerni 63 7 66

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 M Pierce 6 6
M Díaz Oliva 6 6 M Díaz Oliva 3 4
Q E Vesnina 3 2 1 M Pierce 4 68
T Obziler 1 2 A Jidkova 6 710
S Dubois 6 6 S Dubois 6 66 65
A Jidkova 77 6 A Jidkova 3 78 77
8 S Stosur 62 3 A Jidkova 64 6 64
4 J Craybas 62 6 77 Q A Spears 77 4 77
M Irvin 77 2 62 4 J Craybas 1 2
L Lee-Waters 5 3 Q A Spears 6 6
Q A Spears 7 6 Q A Spears 6 77
Ľ Kurhajcová 77 5 6 Ľ Kurhajcová 4 64
A Kapros 62 7 3 Ľ Kurhajcová 7 7
S Kleinová 3 2 5 T Tanasugarn 5 5
5 T Tanasugarn 6 6

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 C Schaul 6 78
A Barna 2 66 6 C Schaul 3 0
WC M Marois 0 5 M Suchá 6 6
M Suchá 6 7 M Suchá 6 4 6
WC M-È Pelletier 1 4 Q S Karatantcheva 1 6 4
S Perry 6 6 S Perry 2 3
Q S Karatantcheva 6 6 Q S Karatantcheva 6 6
3 M Washington 0 2 M Suchá 77 5 78
7 L Granville 6 6 ME Salerni 63 7 66
C Pin 1 1 7 L Granville 60 5
ME Salerni 6 77 ME Salerni 77 7
J Hopkins 2 63 ME Salerni 6 6
S Foretz 4 77 62 Q M Gloria 4 0
Q M Gloria 6 65 77 Q M Gloria 6 2 6
2 D Hantuchová 3 6 1
gollark: It is possible to make GIFs with better colours via methods.
gollark: - things are, on average, generally improving- any economic system which operates at scale, i.e. any able to maintain our modern standard of living, has to wrestle with this complexity too- none of this implies that supply and demand "is made up"
gollark: I don't think this is actually true though. Prices of technology in terms of hours of work have gone down a lot, and the power of it has gone up.
gollark: Presumably because making complex and bureaucracy-driven institutions actually work sanely is an unsolved problem.
gollark: Lack of coherent response interpreted as communism.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.