2004 Albirex Niigata season
| 2004 season | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Manager |  | ||
| Stadium | Niigata Stadium | ||
| J. League 1 | 10th | ||
| Emperor's Cup | 4th Round | ||
| J. League Cup | GL-B 3rd | ||
| Top goalscorer |  | ||
| Average home league attendance | 37,689 | ||
|
| |||
2004 Albirex Niigata season
Competitions
| Competitions | Position |
|---|---|
| J. League 1 | 10th / 16 clubs |
| Emperor's Cup | 4th Round |
| J. League Cup | GL-B 3rd / 4 clubs |
Domestic results
J. League 1
| Match | Date | Venue | Opponents | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-1 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-2 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-3 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-4 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-5 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-6 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-7 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-8 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-9 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-10 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-11 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-12 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-13 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-14 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 1-15 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-1 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-2 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-3 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-4 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-5 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-6 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-7 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-8 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-9 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-10 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-11 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-12 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-13 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-14 | 2004.. | - | ||
| 2-15 | 2004.. | - |
Emperor's Cup
| Match | Date | Venue | Opponents | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4th Round | 2004.. | - |
J. League Cup
| Match | Date | Venue | Opponents | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL-B-1 | 2004.. | - | ||
| GL-B-2 | 2004.. | - | ||
| GL-B-3 | 2004.. | - | ||
| GL-B-4 | 2004.. | - | ||
| GL-B-5 | 2004.. | - | ||
| GL-B-6 | 2004.. | - |
Player statistics
| No. | Pos. | Player | D.o.B. (Age) | Height / Weight | J. League 1 | Emperor's Cup | J. League Cup | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | |||||
| 1 | GK | Koichi Kidera | April 4, 1972 (aged 31) | cm / kg | 11 | 0 | ||||||
| 2 | DF | Yoshiaki Maruyama | October 12, 1974 (aged 29) | cm / kg | 19 | 0 | ||||||
| 3 | DF | Anderson | December 22, 1972 (aged 31) | cm / kg | 12 | 0 | ||||||
| 4 | DF | Kentaro Suzuki | June 2, 1980 (aged 23) | cm / kg | 8 | 0 | ||||||
| 5 | DF | Osamu Umeyama | August 16, 1973 (aged 30) | cm / kg | 7 | 0 | ||||||
| 6 | MF | Tadahiro Akiba | October 13, 1975 (aged 28) | cm / kg | 14 | 0 | ||||||
| 7 | MF | Keisuke Kurihara | May 20, 1973 (aged 30) | cm / kg | 11 | 0 | ||||||
| 8 | MF | Motohiro Yamaguchi | January 29, 1969 (aged 35) | cm / kg | 29 | 2 | ||||||
| 9 | MF | Fabinho | June 26, 1973 (aged 30) | cm / kg | 27 | 9 | ||||||
| 10 | FW | Edmilson | September 15, 1982 (aged 21) | cm / kg | 29 | 15 | ||||||
| 11 | FW | Yusaku Ueno | November 1, 1973 (aged 30) | cm / kg | 30 | 5 | ||||||
| 13 | MF | Toshiyuki Abe | August 1, 1974 (aged 29) | cm / kg | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 14 | DF | Naoki Takahashi | August 8, 1976 (aged 27) | cm / kg | 6 | 1 | ||||||
| 15 | MF | Isao Homma | April 19, 1981 (aged 22) | cm / kg | 12 | 0 | ||||||
| 16 | MF | Yoshito Terakawa | September 6, 1974 (aged 29) | cm / kg | 27 | 0 | ||||||
| 17 | MF | An Yong-Hak | October 25, 1978 (aged 25) | cm / kg | 26 | 3 | ||||||
| 18 | MF | Shingo Suzuki | March 20, 1978 (aged 25) | cm / kg | 30 | 5 | ||||||
| 19 | DF | Hikaru Mita | August 1, 1981 (aged 22) | cm / kg | 10 | 0 | ||||||
| 20 | MF | Hiroyoshi Kuwabara | October 2, 1971 (aged 32) | cm / kg | 24 | 0 | ||||||
| 21 | GK | Yosuke Nozawa | November 9, 1979 (aged 24) | cm / kg | 19 | 0 | ||||||
| 22 | GK | Takashi Kitano | October 4, 1982 (aged 21) | cm / kg | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 23 | MF | Masahiro Fukazawa | July 12, 1977 (aged 26) | cm / kg | 7 | 1 | ||||||
| 24 | FW | Hiroshi Morita | May 18, 1978 (aged 25) | cm / kg | 3 | 1 | ||||||
| 25 | MF | Katsuyuki Miyazawa | September 15, 1976 (aged 27) | cm / kg | 7 | 0 | ||||||
| 26 | MF | Akihiro Kurihara | May 2, 1985 (aged 18) | cm / kg | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 27 | DF | Yuki Sakai | June 28, 1985 (aged 18) | cm / kg | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 28 | FW | Yuzo Funakoshi | June 12, 1977 (aged 26) | cm / kg | 4 | 0 | ||||||
| 29 | DF | Yasushi Kita | April 25, 1978 (aged 25) | cm / kg | 17 | 0 | ||||||
| 31 | FW | Roberto | December 19, 1985 (aged 18) | cm / kg | 1 | 0 | ||||||
| 32 | MF | Tomokazu Hirama | June 30, 1977 (aged 26) | cm / kg | 1 | 0 | ||||||
| 33 | DF | Naoto Matsuo | September 10, 1979 (aged 24) | cm / kg | 11 | 1 | ||||||
| 34 | FW | Oséas | May 14, 1971 (aged 32) | cm / kg | 12 | 4 | ||||||
Other pages
- (in Japanese) J. League official site
gollark: This is why you should use osmarks.tk osmarksbrowser.
gollark: Try NodeOS!
gollark: Or Great Information Transfer.
gollark: Git stands for GIT Is Tremendous.
gollark: The stages of git clone are: Receive a "pack" file of all the objects in the repo database Create an index file for the received pack Check out the head revision (for a non-bare repo, obviously)"Resolving deltas" is the message shown for the second stage, indexing the pack file ("git index-pack").Pack files do not have the actual object IDs in them, only the object content. So to determine what the object IDs are, git has to do a decompress+SHA1 of each object in the pack to produce the object ID, which is then written into the index file.An object in a pack file may be stored as a delta i.e. a sequence of changes to make to some other object. In this case, git needs to retrieve the base object, apply the commands and SHA1 the result. The base object itself might have to be derived by applying a sequence of delta commands. (Even though in the case of a clone, the base object will have been encountered already, there is a limit to how many manufactured objects are cached in memory).In summary, the "resolving deltas" stage involves decompressing and checksumming the entire repo database, which not surprisingly takes quite a long time. Presumably decompressing and calculating SHA1s actually takes more time than applying the delta commands.In the case of a subsequent fetch, the received pack file may contain references (as delta object bases) to other objects that the receiving git is expected to already have. In this case, the receiving git actually rewrites the received pack file to include any such referenced objects, so that any stored pack file is self-sufficient. This might be where the message "resolving deltas" originated.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.